AMD

AMD Opteron 848

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

1
Cores
1
Threads
GHz Boost
89W
TDP

AMD Opteron 848 Specifications

⚙️

Opteron 848 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD Opteron 848 features 1 physical cores and 1 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
1
Threads
1
SMP CPUs
1
⏱️

Opteron 848 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Opteron 848 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Opteron 848 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2.2 GHz
Boost Clock
N/A
Multiplier
11x
💾

AMD's Opteron 848 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Opteron 848 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Opteron 848's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
🏗️

K8 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Opteron 848 is built on AMD's 130 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Opteron 848 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
K8
Codename
SledgeHammer
Process Node
130 nm
Transistors
106 million
Die Size
193 mm²
Generation
Opteron (SledgeHammer (CG))
🔢

K8 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Opteron 848 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
AMD64
AMD-V
🔌

Opteron 848 Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD Opteron 848 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 89W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
89W
🔧

AMD Socket 940 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Opteron 848 uses the AMD Socket 940 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket 940
PCIe
Gen 2
Package
µPGA
DDR5

AMD Socket 940 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Opteron 848 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Opteron 848 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Bus
Dual-channel
📦

Opteron 848 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Opteron 848 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Opteron 848 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
May 2004
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
End-of-life
Part Number
OSA848CEP5AV

Opteron 848 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this CPU.

About AMD Opteron 848

The AMD Opteron 848 is built on a 130 nm manufacturing process, a technology that was state‑of‑the‑art when the chip launched on May 18 2004. Its single‑core, single‑thread design runs at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and draws 89 W of power, fitting into the AMD Socket 940 platform. As part of the early Opteron generation (SledgeHammer (CG)), it introduced AMD’s first 64‑bit server architecture, targeting workloads that required reliable, low‑latency memory access. The 130 nm node gave the chip a relatively large die size, which contributed to its robust thermal characteristics and stable operation under server‑grade conditions.

Benchmark data for the AMD Opteron 848 is scarce, but its performance can be extrapolated from its specifications. With a modest 2.20 GHz clock and a single execution thread, the processor delivers performance comparable to early‑2000s entry‑level servers, handling basic web serving, file sharing, and database queries without bottlenecking. The lack of hyper‑threading and multiple cores means it falls behind modern multi‑core CPUs in parallel workloads, yet its 64‑bit instruction set still offers a solid foundation for legacy applications. In data‑driven terms, expect single‑thread scores in the low‑to‑mid range of contemporary benchmark suites, reflecting its era‑appropriate design.

In its market segment, the AMD Opteron 848 was aimed at small to medium businesses seeking affordable, reliable server solutions during the early 2000s. Its single‑socket configuration made it a cost‑effective choice for entry‑level blade servers, network appliances, and storage arrays that did not demand high parallelism. The processor’s 89 W TDP allowed for dense rack deployments without excessive cooling requirements, appealing to data centers with limited power budgets. For hardware enthusiasts, the Opteron 848 represents a classic example of AMD’s push into the server market, offering a glimpse into the evolution of server‑grade silicon.

When considering an upgrade from the AMD Opteron 848, the primary factor is socket compatibility; newer Opteron and EPYC CPUs use different socket designs, so a motherboard replacement is often necessary. Modern alternatives provide multiple cores, higher clock speeds, and dramatically improved power efficiency, delivering orders of magnitude better performance per watt. Upgrading also opens the door to faster memory technologies, such as DDR3/DDR4, and advanced features like virtualization extensions that the 130 nm Opteron lacks. For users looking to extend the life of legacy systems, a careful cost‑benefit analysis should weigh the expense of a new platform against the performance gains offered by contemporary processors.

The Intel Equivalent of Opteron 848

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-750 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-750

Intel • 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Opteron 848 Comparisons

See how the Opteron 848 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Opteron 848 with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs