AMD FX-4350
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
AMD FX-4350 Specifications
FX-4350 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD FX-4350 features 4 physical cores and 4 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
FX-4350 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in FX-4350 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The FX-4350 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's FX-4350 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the FX-4350 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The FX-4350's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Piledriver Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD FX-4350 is built on AMD's 32 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in FX-4350 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Piledriver Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The FX-4350 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
FX-4350 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD FX-4350 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 125W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket AM3+ Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The FX-4350 uses the AMD Socket AM3+ socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket AM3+ Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the FX-4350 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the FX-4350 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's FX-4350 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD FX-4350 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the FX-4350 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
FX-4350 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the FX-4350 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
FX-4350 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD FX-4350
AMD’s FX-4350 chip is built on the Vishera architecture, a modular 32nm design that splits its four cores into two modules, each with two integer units but only one activated in this configuration. This approach allowed AMD to reuse the same die for different SKUs, but it also limited the FX-4350 to four cores and four threads, rather than the eight cores and eight threads of other Vishera-based processors. The single-core focus meant the FX-4350 prioritized high frequencies over hyperthreading, making it competitive in single-threaded workloads but less efficient in multithreaded scenarios. Despite its modular design, the chip’s architecture lacked modern features like simultaneous multithreading, leaving it at a disadvantage compared to later Zen-based CPUs. Enthusiasts might wonder how this translates to real-world performance, especially in applications that benefit from true multithreading.
With a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a turbo boost to 4.30 GHz, the FX-4350 aimed to deliver aggressive single-core performance, a key strength of the FX generation. These frequencies made it a popular choice for gaming at the time, where high clock speeds often outperformed lower-clocking, multithreaded processors. However, the lack of hyperthreading meant it struggled in CPU-bound multithreaded applications like video encoding or 3D rendering. The chip’s clock speed advantage came at the cost of efficiency, as 32nm technology and the Vishera core’s design made it relatively power-hungry and thermally demanding. Gamers and budget builders might have marveled at its raw speed, but power users likely questioned its value in workloads beyond light multitasking.
Rated at 125W TDP, the FX-4350 chip required robust cooling, especially in overclocked configurations, which were common for this generation. Its AM3+ socket compatibility meant it worked with older motherboards, but users had to pair it with a 95W+ power supply to handle the increased wattage. The Vishera core’s architecture, while efficient for its time, couldn’t match the power-saving advancements of later FinFET-based designs. Enthusiasts might have debated whether the performance gains justified the higher power draw, particularly in systems with limited cooling capabilities. For those prioritizing energy efficiency, the FX-4350’s TDP could be a dealbreaker, but for performance-over-power users, it was a tempting option.
The FX-4350 chip features 2MB of L2 cache per core (4MB total) and 8MB of shared L3 cache, a standard for its era. These cache sizes helped reduce latency in data-intensive tasks, though they paled in comparison to modern Zen processors with larger per-core caches. The shared L3 cache design allowed efficient data access across cores, but the lack of per-core L3 might have led to contention in heavy workloads. While the cache hierarchy was adequate for gaming and basic productivity, it couldn’t match the scalability of newer architectures. One might wonder if the FX-4350’s cache design was a limiting factor in its ability to compete with Intel’s offerings at the time, particularly in latency-sensitive applications.
Targeted at budget gaming rigs and users with AM3+ motherboards, the AMD FX-4350 chip found its niche in systems where high clock speeds mattered more than multithreading. It was a cost-effective upgrade for enthusiasts with older AMD platforms, avoiding the need for a complete platform overhaul. However, its four-thread limit made it less suitable for modern workloads like streaming or content creation, which demand more parallel processing. The 4.30 GHz turbo clock was a draw for single-threaded performance, but the lack of hyperthreading left it trailing in tasks that required true concurrency. For users considering the FX-4350 today, the question remains: is it worth using in a modern build, or has it been overtaken by even entry-level Ryzen chips?
- AMD FX-4350 chip features 4 cores and 4 threads, a result of its Vishera architecture’s deactivated modules.
- 4350’s base clock of 4.20 GHz and turbo boost to 4.30 GHz made it a high-frequency performer for its time.
- AMD’s Vishera-based 4350 has a 125W TDP, requiring robust cooling and power delivery for stable operation.
- AMD FX-4350 chip includes 8MB of shared L3 cache, a standard for mid-range processors in 2013.
- Released on April 29, 2013, the 4350 Zambezi was one of AMD’s last major push for high-clocking desktop CPUs.
The Intel Equivalent of FX-4350
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-4570S offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD FX-4350 Comparisons
See how the FX-4350 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare FX-4350 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs