AMD EPYC 8024PN

Benchmark Performance

The AMD EPYC 8024PN presents a compact 8-core, 16-thread configuration built on the Zen 4c architecture, codenamed Siena. With a base clock of 2.05 GHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz, this processor is positioned at the entry tier of the EPYC 8004 series. The benchmark data for this specific sample shows an average score of zero, placing it at the 50th percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. This percentile figure indicates that the 8024PN sits exactly at the median of the broader CPU landscape, though the absence of scored benchmark runs means the practical performance envelope must be inferred from its architectural and frequency characteristics.

The lack of recorded benchmark scores in the data set means there are no direct delta percentages to report against rival processors. However, the architectural foundation provides clear signals. Zen 4c is a dense-core variant of the Zen 4 design, optimized for high core counts and power efficiency rather than raw single-thread burst performance. The 2.05 GHz base frequency is modest by modern standards, and the 3.00 GHz boost ceiling is similarly conservative. These clock figures, combined with the 8-core layout, suggest that the 8024PN will trail higher-clocked mainstream and workstation parts in lightly threaded workloads, while holding its own in scenarios that scale across multiple cores.

The processor's 80-watt TDP class places it firmly in the efficient tier of server silicon. This power envelope, paired with the 5 nm manufacturing process from TSMC and the 73 mm² die size, indicates that the 8024PN is designed for dense, power-conscious deployments rather than maximum throughput. The 8,875 million transistor count on such a small die reflects the high density of the Zen 4c design, which sacrifices some clock headroom for improved transistor packing and lower power draw.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals field is empty in the data set, which means there are no direct comparative scores or delta percentages available from the benchmark database. Without these reference points, the 8024PN's positioning must be assessed through its architectural peers within the EPYC 8004 family and the broader Zen 4c lineup.

Against higher-core-count EPYC 8004 siblings, the 8024PN will naturally fall behind in multi-threaded throughput due to its 8-core limitation. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is a meaningful resource, but it is divided among fewer cores, which can reduce the effective cache-to-core ratio compared to larger SKUs. In single-threaded tasks, the 3.00 GHz boost clock is the primary differentiator, and this figure places it below many competing server and workstation processors that push boost frequencies beyond 4 GHz.

Compared to non-server Zen 4 parts, the 8024PN's clock speeds are noticeably lower, reflecting its focus on power efficiency and density rather than peak performance. The six-channel DDR5 memory bus and 230.4 GB/s bandwidth are server-grade features that exceed what typical desktop platforms offer, but the modest core count means the processor may not fully saturate this memory bandwidth in everyday workloads. The 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide substantial I/O capability, which is a stronger attribute for storage and networking applications than for compute-bound tasks.

Power and Thermals

The 80-watt TDP places the EPYC 8024PN in a power class that requires only modest cooling solutions. In a server context, this translates to a capable air cooler or a low-profile heatsink, since the thermal density is far lower than high-TDP workstation parts that demand large radiators or advanced liquid cooling. The 5 nm process node contributes to this efficiency, as the dense Zen 4c cores draw less power per transistor than older designs.

The combination of an 80-watt envelope and a 73 mm² die size yields a relatively low power density, which simplifies thermal management in multi-socket or high-density chassis. For system integrators, this means the 8024PN can be deployed in 1U servers with minimal airflow requirements, or in compact edge platforms where space and cooling are constrained. The six-channel memory controller and 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes do add some power overhead, but the overall package remains well within the range of standard server cooling infrastructure.

The lack of an unlocked multiplier confirms that this is not a processor designed for enthusiast overclocking. Its power and thermal behavior are intended to be predictable and consistent, which is a priority for enterprise deployments where reliability and uptime matter more than peak performance. The 80-watt TDP also positions the 8024PN for workloads that run continuously at high utilization, where lower power draw translates directly into reduced operating costs over the system's lifespan.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD EPYC 8024PN?

A: The EPYC 8024PN has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4c architecture.

Q: What is the base and boost clock speed?

A: The base clock is 2.05 GHz and the boost clock is 3.00 GHz.

Q: What memory and I/O features does it support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory with a six-channel bus and 230.4 GB/s bandwidth, plus 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What socket does this processor use?

A: It uses AMD Socket SP6, which is specific to the EPYC 8004 series.

Q: What is the manufacturing process and die size?

A: The processor is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 73 mm² and 8,875 million transistors.

Q: When was the EPYC 8024PN released?

A: Its release date is September 17, 2023, and it remains in active production.

Who Should Consider It

The EPYC 8024PN is best suited for single-socket servers that prioritize power efficiency and compact form factors over raw compute throughput. Its 8 cores and 16 threads are adequate for light virtualization, network appliances, edge computing, and storage controllers, where the 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and six-channel DDR5 memory provide substantial I/O bandwidth for connected devices. The 80-watt TDP makes it an excellent fit for fanless or low-noise environments, such as small office servers or industrial PCs that must operate in thermally constrained spaces.

For database or web-serving workloads that are latency-sensitive but not heavily threaded, the 3.00 GHz boost clock offers acceptable responsiveness, and the 32 MB shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores. However, for compute-heavy tasks like video rendering, scientific simulation, or large-scale data analytics, the limited core count will become a bottleneck. The processor's strength lies in handling many concurrent, low-intensity requests rather than a few demanding computations.

Workloads that benefit from high memory bandwidth per core are also a good match. The 230.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, divided across just 8 cores, provides a generous per-core allocation that can accelerate memory-bound applications such as in-memory databases or real-time analytics. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required for any display output, which is typical for server platforms but worth noting for edge deployments that might otherwise rely on integrated graphics.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The 2.05 GHz base clock and 3.00 GHz boost clock define a processor that prioritizes sustained multi-core throughput over single-core burst performance. In single-threaded tasks, the 3.00 GHz ceiling is moderate, and the 8024PN will likely trail processors with higher boost frequencies by a noticeable margin. This affects workloads like legacy application compatibility, certain database queries, and interactive sessions where a single thread determines overall responsiveness.

Multi-threaded behavior is more favorable. The 8 cores run at 2.05 GHz base across all threads, and the 80-watt TDP allows the processor to maintain near-boost clocks under full load without thermal throttling in most server chassis. The 16 threads provide reasonable parallel throughput for workloads that scale well, such as web servers, containerized microservices, or batch processing jobs. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is a single pool accessible by all cores, which reduces inter-core communication latency compared to designs with fragmented cache partitions.

The single-thread to multi-thread ratio suggests that the 8024PN is optimized for consistent, predictable performance across many concurrent sessions rather than for minimizing the latency of any individual request. The six-channel memory bus reinforces this interpretation, as the high memory bandwidth serves aggregate throughput across all cores rather than boosting single-thread memory access speed. For deployments that run many small VMs or containers, this balance is ideal, but for workstations running a single heavy application, a higher-clocked processor would deliver better perceived performance.