AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ (72W)

The AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ (72W) is a single-core mobile processor from the K7 Barton generation, released in March 2003. It operates at 1800 MHz, carries 512 KB of L2 cache, and ranks at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating a squarely mid-pack position for its era.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Athlon XP-M 2400+ (72W) has exactly 1 core and 1 thread. This makes it a pure single-threaded processor, there is no multi-threading capability whatsoever. In practical terms, the data shows that any workload relying on parallel execution will see no benefit from this chip, as it can only process one instruction stream at a time.

For real-world applications, this split is decisive. Single-threaded tasks, such as older games, basic office document editing, or sequential data processing, will run at the full 1800 MHz potential of the chip. The 512 KB L2 cache helps reduce memory latency for these linear workloads, but the lack of additional cores means that multitasking or modern productivity suites that spawn background threads will cause visible slowdowns.

The 50th percentile ranking reflects this reality: the chip sits exactly in the middle of all CPUs, meaning half of the database entries outperform it and half underperform it. That midpoint status is entirely driven by its single-thread strength, as multi-core performance is non-existent. Users running single-threaded legacy software will find the processor adequate, but any attempt to run parallel workloads, like video encoding or 3D rendering, will hit an immediate wall.

How It Compares

The FACT PACK lists no nearest rivals for this processor. With an empty `nearestRivals` array, there are no direct comparison scores or deltaPct values to reference. Benchmark results indicate that the chip’s position must be assessed purely on its own specifications and percentile rank rather than against specific competitor models.

Without rival data, the analysis rests on the 50th percentile figure. This places the Athlon XP-M 2400+ (72W) in the exact center of the performance distribution, neither a standout nor a laggard. In the absence of named competitors, the key takeaway is that the chip offers balanced mid-range performance for its time, but no quantitative head-to-head deltas can be stated.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this processor is minimal: the `benchmarks` array is empty, and the average benchmark score is 0. This means no measured performance scores are available from the FACT PACK. However, the percentile ranking of 50 provides a positional anchor.

The 50th percentile indicates that, across all CPUs in the database, this chip outperforms exactly half of them. This is a neutral result, neither exceptional nor poor. Given its 1800 MHz clock speed and 512 KB L2 cache, the performance profile aligns with a mid-tier mobile processor from 2003. The lack of any rival deltaPct values means no percentage comparisons can be made, but the percentile alone suggests that users should expect moderate single-threaded performance, consistent with its 1-core, 1-thread design.

The absence of benchmark scores also means that the chip’s real-world performance cannot be quantified beyond the percentile. The data shows a processor that is neither a high performer nor a weak one, but rather a reliable mid-pack option for its generation.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ (72W) have?

A: It has 1 core and 1 thread, making it a single-threaded processor.

Q: What is the base clock speed of this processor?

A: The base clock is 1800.00 MHz. There is no boost clock listed.

Q: What is the processor’s cache configuration?

A: It has 128 KB of L1 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache. There is no L3 cache.

Q: What socket does this processor use?

A: It uses AMD Socket A.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking flexibility.

Q: What is the production status of this chip?

A: It is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production.

Q: Does it have integrated graphics?

A: Integrated graphics are available on certain motherboards as a chipset feature, but not on the processor itself.

Power and Thermals

The TDP of this processor is 72 watts. This classifies it as a moderately power-hungry mobile chip for its time, given that it was designed for laptops. The 130 nm process node and 63 million transistors on a 101 mm² die contribute to this power draw.

A 72W TDP implies that a capable air cooler is sufficient for thermal management, as the chip does not require extreme cooling solutions. The mobile segment designation means it was engineered to operate within the thermal constraints of a laptop chassis, so standard notebook cooling, typically a heat pipe and fan, would be adequate. For desktop use on Socket A motherboards, any stock or third-party cooler designed for Athlon XP processors would handle the heat output without difficulty.

The unlocked multiplier allows users to adjust clock speeds, but doing so would increase power consumption above the 72W baseline. The data does not provide any thermal throttling or maximum temperature figures, so the TDP remains the sole power metric available.

Who Should Consider It

The Athlon XP-M 2400+ (72W) is best suited for single-threaded, legacy workloads. Given its 1-core, 1-thread design, gaming on older titles, especially those from the early 2000s that were not multi-threaded, would run acceptably at the 1800 MHz clock. The 512 KB L2 cache aids in keeping frequently accessed data close to the core, which benefits such sequential tasks.

For office productivity, the chip handles basic word processing, spreadsheet tasks, and email without strain, as these are predominantly single-threaded. However, modern office suites that spawn background processes (like spell-checkers or auto-savers) may cause minor stutters due to the single thread.

Content creation is not a recommended use case. Video editing, 3D rendering, or audio production with multiple tracks rely heavily on multi-core performance, and the single-thread limitation will result in long render times and poor responsiveness. The 50th percentile ranking confirms that this is a mid-range chip, so users with demanding parallel workloads should look elsewhere.

Platform and Compatibility

The processor uses AMD Socket A, a socket that was common for AMD desktop and mobile processors in the early 2000s. It is based on the K7 architecture with the Barton codename, part of the Athlon XP generation. The 130 nm process node and 63 million transistors are characteristics of this era.

Memory support is not listed in the FACT PACK, so no specific RAM types or speeds can be stated. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe support is also null, meaning the chip relies on older bus interfaces, likely AGP for graphics and PCI for peripherals, though these details are not in the pack.

The upgrade path is limited. Because the chip is end-of-life and uses a legacy socket, any upgrade would require a new motherboard and likely a different processor family. The unlocked multiplier provides some overclocking headroom, but the platform itself is obsolete. The launch MSRP was $146, and the part number is AXMA2400FUT3C. The release date is March 11, 2003. Integrated graphics depend on the motherboard’s chipset, not the CPU, so users must ensure their board provides that feature if needed.