AMD Athlon XP 3200+ (333FSB)

The AMD Athlon XP 3200+ (333FSB) is a single-core desktop processor from the 3000 series, built on the K7 architecture with the Barton codename. It operates at a fixed base clock of 2.33 GHz, features 128 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 cache, and is manufactured on a 130 nm process node with 63 million transistors on a 101 mm² die. The database places it at the 50th percentile of all tracked CPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that no recorded performance tests are present in this dataset. Released on May 12, 2003, with a launch MSRP of $464, it uses the AMD Socket A interface and supports DDR1 memory dependent on the motherboard.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark array for this processor is empty, and the average benchmark score is recorded as zero. Consequently, no direct performance scores are available to analyze. However, the percentileVsAllCpus field indicates a rank of 50, meaning this processor sits exactly at the median of all CPUs in the database. This positioning suggests that, based on the aggregated historical data, it represents a typical or average performer relative to the entire population of tracked processors. The lack of benchmark entries means the score of zero is a placeholder rather than a measured result.

The raw specifications define its theoretical capability. A 2.33 GHz base clock on a single core with a single thread establishes a purely sequential execution model. The 512 KB L2 cache is relatively large for the architecture, historically serving to reduce memory latency and improve hit rates for frequently accessed data. The 130 nm process node and 63 million transistors on a 101 mm² die indicate a mature manufacturing process for its generation. Since no rival deltas are provided, the percentile rank is the sole quantitative reference point for performance positioning. The data shows a processor that would have been a mainstream part at its release, not a flagship or entry-level component, given its median standing across all CPUs tracked in the database.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals field is empty, so there are no direct rival names, scores, or deltaPct values to reference in this database. Without this data, a comparative analysis against specific competing models is not possible. The only available comparison is the global percentile rank of 50, which places it at the midpoint of all CPUs tracked by the database. This implies that, in the absence of specific rival data, the processor's performance is exactly average across the entire historical spectrum. The absence of rival entries means that any statement about being ahead or behind a particular competitor would be speculative. The database provides no basis for percentage deltas. Therefore, the analysis must rely on the intrinsic specifications and the global percentile to infer its standing. The processor's single-core, single-thread design, combined with a 2.33 GHz clock, suggests it would have been competitive within its own generation, but without rival data, that cannot be quantified. The end-of-life production status further indicates that it is no longer a current product, so any comparison would be historical in nature.

Platform and Compatibility

The processor uses the AMD Socket A interface, which is a physical socket designed for the K7 architecture. Memory support is listed as DDR1, with the note that it depends on the motherboard. This indicates that the memory controller is not integrated into the CPU but rather resides on the motherboard chipset. Consequently, the supported memory type and speed are determined by the specific motherboard chosen. The processor does not have a PCIe interface listed, as the data shows a null value for pcie. This implies that the system relies on older bus architectures such as AGP and PCI, which were standard for the Socket A platform. Integrated graphics are listed as "On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)", meaning the processor itself does not contain a GPU, but some motherboards with compatible chipsets provided onboard video. The production status is end-of-life, indicating that AMD no longer manufactures or sells this processor. The multiplier is not unlocked, so users cannot easily adjust the clock multiplier for overclocking. The part number is AXDA3200DKV4D. The lack of an integrated memory controller means that memory performance is heavily dependent on the motherboard chipset, and the upgrade path is limited to other Socket A processors, all of which are also end-of-life.

Who Should Consider It

Given the single core and single thread configuration, this processor is fundamentally limited to single-threaded workloads. Office applications that are not heavily multi-threaded, such as word processing, spreadsheet management, and email, would be within its capability, though the 2.33 GHz clock and 512 KB L2 cache would provide basic responsiveness. For gaming, the lack of a second core and the absence of modern instruction sets would severely limit performance in any contemporary title, but for legacy games it could suffice. Content creation tasks that rely on multi-threading, such as video rendering or 3D modeling, are not suitable, as the processor can only execute one thread at a time. The 50th percentile rank suggests it is an average performer among all CPUs, which historically means it was a mainstream part, not a high-end or low-end part. Users considering this processor today would likely be building a retro system or maintaining legacy hardware. The end-of-life status means replacement parts are scarce. The launch MSRP was $464, which places it in a premium tier at its release, but that is a historical fact. The data indicates that for any modern workload requiring parallel execution, this processor is not a viable option.

Power and Thermals

The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 79 watts. This figure indicates the maximum amount of heat the cooling system must dissipate under typical sustained loads. For a processor from 2003, a 79W TDP is moderate, requiring a capable air cooler with a fan to maintain safe operating temperatures. The 130 nm process node is relatively large by modern standards, which influences the power density. With 63 million transistors on a 101 mm² die, the transistor density is low compared to modern chips, which helps keep the TDP manageable. The lack of a boost clock means the processor runs at a fixed 2.33 GHz, so the power draw is consistent. Users would need a cooling solution that can handle 79W of heat, which typically means a standard air cooler with a fan. The data does not provide any thermal throttling information, but the fixed clock suggests that if cooling is adequate, performance is stable. The 79W TDP places it in a power class that does not require exotic cooling solutions, but it does demand a properly mounted heatsink and airflow within the case to avoid overheating.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

This processor has exactly one core and one thread, making it a purely single-threaded design. The base clock of 2.33 GHz is the sole operating frequency, as there is no boost clock. Consequently, all workloads run on a single execution pipeline. The L1 cache is 128 KB and the L2 cache is 512 KB, which are generous for the era and help mitigate the latency of accessing DDR1 memory. In single-threaded applications, the processor can dedicate its full 2.33 GHz and all cache resources to that single task. However, any multi-threaded application will not benefit from additional cores, as none exist. The database's percentile rank of 50 reflects its overall standing, but the single-thread nature means that its performance in modern multi-threaded benchmarks would be poor. The data shows that the processor is not suited for parallel workloads. For tasks that are inherently sequential, such as certain legacy software, the 2.33 GHz clock and 512 KB L2 cache provide a reasonable baseline. The absence of a boost clock means there is no dynamic frequency scaling, so the processor operates at a constant speed. This behavior is predictable for thermal management, but it also means the processor cannot temporarily increase its clock to handle burst workloads, relying solely on its fixed 2.33 GHz frequency.