AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Athlon X2 QL-64 Specifications
Athlon X2 QL-64 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Athlon X2 QL-64 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Athlon X2 QL-64 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Athlon X2 QL-64 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's Athlon X2 QL-64 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Athlon X2 QL-64 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Athlon X2 QL-64's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
K10 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 is built on AMD's 65 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Athlon X2 QL-64 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
K10 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Athlon X2 QL-64 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Athlon X2 QL-64 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 35W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket S1 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Athlon X2 QL-64 uses the AMD Socket S1 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket S1 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Athlon X2 QL-64 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Athlon X2 QL-64 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's Athlon X2 QL-64 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Athlon X2 QL-64 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Athlon X2 QL-64 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Athlon X2 QL-64 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
Athlon X2 QL-64 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 is a mobile processor from the K10 architecture generation, codenamed Griffin, targeting the entry-level laptop segment during its production period. Launched at the end of 2008, this dual-core chip was designed for power-conscious computing environments, operating at a base clock of 2.10 GHz with no boost capability. The processor features 256 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache, with the latter being shared across both cores.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 is notably sparse, with no synthetic benchmark scores recorded in the database. This absence of numerical performance data is significant in itself, as it positions the processor outside the range of commonly tested desktop or high-performance mobile parts. The processor holds a percentile rank of 50 against the entire CPU database, placing it at the exact median of all processors tracked by the platform. This percentile figure suggests that while the QL-64 is not a performance outlier, it does not represent the absolute lowest tier of computing capability either.
Without benchmark scores, the performance analysis must rely on architectural characteristics and the processor's positioning within AMD's mobile lineup. The dual-core, dual-thread configuration at 2.10 GHz within a 35-watt thermal envelope indicates a design prioritising efficiency over raw throughput. In practical terms, the absence of a boost clock means the processor operates at a fixed frequency, providing consistent but unremarkable performance in both lightly threaded and multi-threaded workloads.
The lack of nearest rival data further complicates direct comparison. The database does not list any comparable processors with score deltas, meaning the QL-64's performance relative to contemporaries must be inferred from its specifications. A 2.10 GHz dual-core K10 chip with 1 MB of L2 cache would typically be outclassed by processors with higher clock speeds, larger caches, or additional cores. The 50th percentile ranking, however, indicates that in the broader historical context of all CPUs, this processor sits in the middle of the pack, a position that likely reflects its mobile efficiency focus rather than competitive performance metrics.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals field in the database is empty, providing no direct comparative benchmarks or percentage deltas against competing processors. This absence of comparison data means the QL-64 cannot be positioned against specific rival models using measured performance differences. In this context, the analysis must consider the processor's market placement based on its architectural features and production timeline.
As a K10-generation mobile chip released in late 2008, the QL-64 would have competed against similar dual-core mobile processors from the same era. The 65 nm process node and 35-watt TDP indicate a focus on battery life and thermal management for thin-and-light laptops. Compared to higher-end mobile processors of its time, the QL-64's fixed 2.10 GHz clock and modest cache allocation would place it at the entry level of AMD's mobile offerings. The dual-channel memory bus provides adequate memory bandwidth for its class, though the lack of L3 cache limits performance scaling in cache-sensitive workloads.
Without specific rival scores, the most meaningful comparison is the percentile ranking. Being at the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database suggests that the QL-64 outperforms roughly half of all processors ever tracked, which includes many low-power embedded and older mobile parts. This positioning is consistent with a processor designed for basic productivity tasks, web browsing, and office applications rather than demanding computational workloads.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 presents a straightforward processing model with two physical cores and two threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. Each core operates at the fixed frequency of 2.10 GHz, with the 1 MB L2 cache shared between both cores. This configuration results in identical single-threaded and dual-threaded clock speeds, with no boost mechanism to temporarily increase frequency for lightly threaded tasks.
For single-threaded workloads, the QL-64's performance is determined entirely by its 2.10 GHz clock speed and the efficiency of the K10 architecture. Applications that rely on a single core, such as older games or certain legacy software, would see consistent performance without any frequency variation. The lack of a boost clock means that single-threaded performance is static, providing predictable but unexceptional responsiveness in daily computing tasks.
Multi-threaded behaviour benefits from the dual-core design, allowing two independent threads to execute in parallel. The shared 1 MB L2 cache helps mitigate the latency of accessing main memory, though the absence of L3 cache means that cache misses incur the full penalty of a dual-channel memory access. For workloads that scale with core count, such as video encoding or multitasking with multiple applications, the QL-64 can demonstrate reasonable efficiency, though modern processors with more cores will significantly outperform it. The fixed clock speed ensures that both cores operate at maximum frequency simultaneously, preventing any thermal throttling-induced frequency reductions during sustained multi-threaded loads.
FAQ
Q: What is the base clock speed of the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64?
A: The processor operates at a fixed base clock of 2.10 GHz with no boost clock capability, meaning the frequency remains constant under all operating conditions.
Q: Does the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 support ECC memory?
A: No, the processor does not support ECC memory, indicating its target market is consumer mobile computing rather than error-critical server or workstation environments.
Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 have?
A: It features two physical cores and two threads, with no simultaneous multithreading technology, so it can process exactly two threads concurrently.
Q: On which socket does the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 operate?
A: The processor uses the AMD Socket S1, a mobile-specific socket designed for laptop and portable computing platforms.
Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, preventing user-based frequency adjustments and confining the processor to its specified 2.10 GHz operating point.
Q: What is the production status of the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64?
A: The processor is classified as end-of-life, meaning AMD has ceased production and it is no longer actively marketed for new systems.
Power and Thermals
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 carries a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 35 watts, a figure that defines its maximum heat dissipation under typical sustained workloads. This TDP classification places the processor in the ultra-low-power mobile segment, designed for laptops prioritising battery life and quiet operation over peak performance. The 35-watt envelope is achieved partly through the 65 nm process node, which, while not cutting-edge for its era, allowed AMD to balance power consumption with manufacturing costs.
The thermal implications of this TDP are significant for system design. A 35-watt processor can be adequately cooled by a compact heatsink and a low-speed fan, or even a passive cooling solution in some chassis designs. The fixed 2.10 GHz clock speed ensures that power draw remains relatively constant, simplifying thermal management compared to processors with boost clocks that create variable heat loads. The K10 architecture's power management features would further reduce consumption during idle states, though the database does not specify idle power figures.
For cooling tier, the 35-watt TDP implies that a capable air cooler with a small fan is sufficient for sustained operation. Laptops equipped with this processor would typically feature a single heat pipe and a small blower-style fan, adequate for dissipating 35 watts of heat in a constrained form factor. The absence of a boost clock means there is no transient thermal spike to accommodate, allowing system designers to size the cooling solution precisely to the continuous power draw.
Platform and Compatibility
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 is built for the AMD Socket S1, a mobile-specific socket that was used across AMD's laptop platforms during the late 2000s. The processor utilises the K10 architecture, codenamed Griffin, and was fabricated on a 65 nm process node. This combination of socket and architecture defines the upgrade path: users are limited to processors sharing the Socket S1 interface and compatible with the Griffin generation.
Memory support includes a dual-channel memory bus, providing two memory channels for improved bandwidth compared to single-channel designs. The database does not specify the memory types or speeds supported, nor does it list a maximum memory bandwidth figure. The processor does not support ECC memory, confirming its consumer-oriented positioning. The dual-channel configuration is notable for its era, as many competing mobile processors of the time utilised single-channel memory, giving the QL-64 a potential memory bandwidth advantage in memory-intensive applications.
PCIe support is not specified in the database, reflecting the mobile platform's integration of peripheral connectivity through the chipset rather than the processor itself. The integrated graphics are listed as "On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)", indicating that graphics capability was provided by the motherboard chipset rather than integrated into the processor die. This architecture was common during this period, where the northbridge handled both memory control and graphics output. The end-of-life production status means the processor has no active upgrade path within current platforms, and its compatibility is limited to legacy Socket S1 motherboards designed around the Griffin architecture. The part number AMQL64DAM22GG identifies this specific configuration for OEM system builders, though no launch MSRP was recorded in the database.
The Intel Equivalent of Athlon X2 QL-64
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-750 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 Comparisons
See how the Athlon X2 QL-64 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Athlon X2 QL-64 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs