AMD Athlon 64 3000+
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
Integrated GPUAt a Glance
AMDAMD Athlon 64 3000+ Specifications
Athlon 64 3000+ Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ features 1 physical cores and 1 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Athlon 64 3000+ Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Athlon 64 3000+ benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Athlon 64 3000+ by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's Athlon 64 3000+ Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Athlon 64 3000+ processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Athlon 64 3000+'s cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
K8 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ is built on AMD's 130 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Athlon 64 3000+ incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
K8 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Athlon 64 3000+ by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Athlon 64 3000+ Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 89W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket 754 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the AMD Socket 754 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket 754 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Athlon 64 3000+ define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Athlon 64 3000+ determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's Athlon 64 3000+ Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Athlon 64 3000+ provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Athlon 64 3000+ Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Athlon 64 3000+ by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
Athlon 64 3000+ Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD Athlon 64 3000+
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ is a single-core desktop processor from the 3000 series, built on the K8 architecture (NewCastle) and released on April 26, 2004. It sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database, indicating median performance among all recorded parts. With a base clock of 2000 MHz, 128 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 cache, this end-of-life processor targets basic computing tasks.
Benchmark Performance
The database lists no individual benchmark scores for the Athlon 64 3000+, and its aggregate benchmark score is zero. However, its percentile ranking against all CPUs is exactly 50, meaning it outperforms half of the recorded processors and is outperformed by the other half. This median position is notable for a single-core part from 2004, given that the database includes many multi-core and higher-clocked processors. The base clock of 2000 MHz, combined with a single core and a 512 KB L2 cache, are the primary performance attributes. Without rival scores, we cannot compute percentage deltas, but the percentile alone provides a clear central placement. The absence of benchmark data means that the 50th percentile is the only quantitative measure of its performance relative to the broader CPU landscape.
Platform and Compatibility
The processor uses AMD Socket 754, a platform that is now end-of-life. It supports DDR1 memory in a single-channel configuration, with no ECC capability. The memory bus is single-channel, which limits memory bandwidth compared to dual-channel designs, though the fact pack does not specify a bandwidth figure. The processor does not list a PCIe interface, so expansion relies on chipset-provided slots. Integrated graphics are not on-die; they are a chipset feature available on certain motherboards. The production status is end-of-life, meaning no new units are manufactured, and upgrade paths within this socket are nonexistent as no other CPUs are listed for it. The 130 nm process node, 69 million transistors, and 144 mm² die size are architectural details that define its physical characteristics. The processor has no L3 cache, and its memory support is limited to DDR1 without ECC, which further restricts its use in error-critical environments. The release date of April 2004 places it in the early days of the Athlon 64 lineup, and its part number is ADA3000AEP4APADA3000AEP4ARADA3000AEP4AX.
Who Should Consider It
Given its single-core, single-thread design and 2000 MHz clock, the Athlon 64 3000+ is suited for basic office applications, light web browsing, and legacy software that does not require multiple cores. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it can handle everyday tasks at a level comparable to the median of all CPUs, but it will struggle with modern multi-threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or contemporary gaming that relies on multiple cores. Users running single-threaded legacy applications may find it adequate. The absence of a boost clock means performance is fixed at 2000 MHz under all conditions. The 89W TDP indicates that a conventional desktop cooling solution is required, but no specific cooler tier is defined. For anyone considering this processor today, its end-of-life status and lack of modern features like PCIe or ECC memory make it a historical part rather than a practical choice. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU itself means a discrete graphics card or a chipset with integrated graphics is necessary for display output.
How It Compares
The fact pack lists no nearest rivals for the Athlon 64 3000+. Therefore, a direct comparison with specific competing processors is not possible from the available data. Its 50th percentile position is the only comparative metric, placing it at the exact median of all CPUs in the database. This means that without rival scores, we cannot assert any percentage lead or deficit. The architectural attributes—single core, 2000 MHz, 512 KB L2—are the only basis for inferring relative performance. In the absence of rival data, the percentile remains the sole quantitative anchor for its standing. The processor's median placement implies that it is neither a standout performer nor a laggard, but rather a typical representative of the database's population. Because no specific rival names or scores are provided, any attempt to compare it to known CPUs would be speculative and is therefore omitted.
Power and Thermals
The Athlon 64 3000+ has a thermal design power (TDP) of 89 watts. This is a fixed value that indicates the maximum heat the cooling system must dissipate under typical load. For a single-core processor, 89W is a moderate figure, implying that a standard desktop heatsink and fan should suffice. The fact pack does not specify a cooling tier, but the TDP alone suggests a conventional air cooler is adequate. The processor does not have a boost clock, so power draw remains consistent with the 2000 MHz base frequency. The 130 nm process node and 69 million transistor count are relevant to its power efficiency, but no efficiency numbers are provided. In practice, the 89W TDP is a practical specification for system builders selecting a power supply and cooling solution. The die size of 144 mm² also contributes to thermal characteristics, though no specific thermal resistance figures are listed.
FAQ
Q: What is the base clock speed of the AMD Athlon 64 3000+?
A: The base clock is 2000 MHz.
Q: Does this processor support boost clocking?
A: No boost clock is listed; the processor runs at a fixed 2000 MHz.
Q: What memory type does it support?
A: It supports DDR1 memory in a single-channel configuration, without ECC.
Q: Does it have integrated graphics?
A: Integrated graphics are not on the CPU; they are a chipset feature on certain motherboards.
Q: What is the production status?
A: The production status is end-of-life.
Q: How many cores and threads does it have?
A: It has 1 core and 1 thread.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The Athlon 64 3000+ is a single-core, single-thread processor. It cannot execute multiple threads simultaneously, so all workloads are inherently single-threaded. This means its performance in multi-threaded applications is limited to a single thread's execution, which is a significant disadvantage compared to multi-core processors. The 2000 MHz base clock and 512 KB L2 cache are the primary determinants of its single-thread performance. The 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, which include multi-core parts, suggests that its single-thread capability is around the median of the entire database. However, because no benchmark scores are recorded, we cannot quantify its single-thread performance relative to specific rivals. In practice, users should expect this processor to handle single-threaded tasks adequately, but it will not scale with multi-threaded workloads. The lack of a boost clock means there is no transient performance headroom, and the single-channel memory interface further limits data throughput for memory-intensive single-threaded applications. For workloads that are inherently sequential, such as older games or single-threaded productivity tools, the Athlon 64 3000+ can still function, but its performance ceiling is set by its fixed clock and cache size.
The Intel Equivalent of Athlon 64 3000+
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-750 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Comparisons
See how the Athlon 64 3000+ stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Athlon 64 3000+ with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs