AMD

AMD Athlon 1000

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

1
Cores
1
Threads
GHz Boost
65W
TDP

AMD Athlon 1000 Specifications

⚙️

Athlon 1000 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD Athlon 1000 features 1 physical cores and 1 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
1
Threads
1
SMP CPUs
1
⏱️

Athlon 1000 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Athlon 1000 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Athlon 1000 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
1000 GHz
Boost Clock
N/A
Multiplier
10x
💾

AMD's Athlon 1000 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Athlon 1000 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Athlon 1000's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
🏗️

K10 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Athlon 1000 is built on AMD's 180 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Athlon 1000 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
K10
Codename
Magnolia
Process Node
180 nm
Transistors
22 million
Die Size
102 mm²
Generation
Athlon Model 2 (Orion)
🔢

K10 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Athlon 1000 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
AMD-V
🔌

Athlon 1000 Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD Athlon 1000 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 65W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
65W
🔧

AMD Slot A Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Athlon 1000 uses the AMD Slot A socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Slot A
Chipsets
AMD 750, VIA KX133
Package
SECC
DDR5

AMD Slot A Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Athlon 1000 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Athlon 1000 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
unknown Depends on motherboard
Memory Bus
Single-channel
📦

Athlon 1000 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Athlon 1000 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Athlon 1000 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Mar 2000
Launch Price
$1299
Market
Desktop
Status
End-of-life
Part Number
AMD-K7100MNR53BA
Bundled Cooler
Yes

Athlon 1000 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this CPU.

About AMD Athlon 1000

The AMD Athlon 1000 by AMD, built on the Athlon Model 2 (Orion) architecture, arrived in March 2000 as a flagship Slot A processor targeting demanding desktop workloads. Fabricated on a 180 nm process, it employed a full-speed L2 cache design that aimed to reduce latency compared to earlier K6-era implementations. With a single core and single thread, the chip relied on raw frequency rather than parallelism to deliver performance. How effectively did this approach scale against emerging multi-threaded software, and did the 180 nm thermal envelope leave meaningful headroom for sustained boost behavior? The architecture’s pipeline and FPU were optimized for the era’s multimedia and productivity tasks, yet the absence of modern instruction sets raises questions about forward compatibility. Operating at a base clock of 1000.00 GHz, the part’s frequency strategy was straightforward: a fixed clock without formal turbo mechanisms typical of later generations. In an age before aggressive boost curves, this design choice prioritized determinism, but it also invited scrutiny regarding responsiveness under variable loads. Was the lack of turbo a limitation for bursty workloads, or did the consistent clock deliver more predictable performance for professional environments? The 65W TDP framed the thermal design, suggesting a balance between performance and cooling requirements that system integrators had to respect. Under sustained compute, the thermal envelope would likely constrain overclocking, challenging enthusiasts to extract extra performance without compromising stability. The cache hierarchy featured on-die L1 and external L2 cache running at full processor speed, a defining characteristic of the Slot A Athlons of this era. With a 128 KB L1 and 256 KB (or 512 KB on some models) L2, the AMD Athlon 1000 by AMD sought to minimize memory latency for common desktop workloads. How did the reliance on large, full-speed L2 compare to Intel’s approach of partitioned caches and different clock domains? Memory controllers on the northbridge, rather than on-die, meant performance could vary with platform choice and memory subsystem tuning. These architectural decisions shaped the real-world experience, especially in latency-sensitive applications. - Single-core, single-thread design with a 1000.00 GHz base clock - 65W TDP with a fixed frequency and no turbo boost - Slot A socket and Athlon Model 2 (Orion) architecture on 180 nm process Target use cases for the AMD Athlon 1000 by AMD spanned high-end consumer desktops, productivity suites, and early 3D gaming rigs that benefited from strong FPU performance. Professionals evaluating stability, longevity, and platform cost might ask whether the $1299 launch price delivered compelling value relative to contemporary Pentium III systems. In multimedia encoding, scientific calculations, and office workloads, the single-core design could saturate quickly, exposing limitations in parallel scenarios. Would a typical 2000-era gamer see more benefit from frequency headroom or from architectural features like SSE optimizations and memory bandwidth? For system builders, the thermal and power profile required capable cooling, but the Slot A form factor allowed flexible chassis integration. In retrospect, the AMD Athlon 1000 stands as a milestone in frequency leadership and architectural ambition for AMD at the turn of the millennium. The absence of turbo clocks and multi-threading places it firmly in a single-core paradigm, which raises questions about its viability as a collector’s piece versus a practical retro build. How does the 65W thermal design inform cooling choices in modern enclosures, and what are the trade-offs for maintaining original specifications? While benchmark data is not available here, the combination of full-speed L2 cache and a 1 GHz target frequency suggests strong single-thread performance for its time. For those seeking to understand its relevance today, the chip’s historical significance may outweigh its raw computational throughput.

The Intel Equivalent of Athlon 1000

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-750 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-750

Intel • 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Athlon 1000 Comparisons

See how the Athlon 1000 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Athlon 1000 with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs