AMD A9-9410 SoC
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
Integrated GPUAt a Glance
AMDAMD A9-9410 SoC Specifications
A9-9410 SoC Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD A9-9410 SoC features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
A9-9410 SoC Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in A9-9410 SoC benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The A9-9410 SoC by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's A9-9410 SoC Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the A9-9410 SoC processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The A9-9410 SoC's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Excavator Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD A9-9410 SoC is built on AMD's 28 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in A9-9410 SoC incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Excavator Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The A9-9410 SoC by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
A9-9410 SoC Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD A9-9410 SoC has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 15W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket FP4 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The A9-9410 SoC uses the AMD Socket FP4 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket FP4 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the A9-9410 SoC define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the A9-9410 SoC determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's A9-9410 SoC Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD A9-9410 SoC includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the A9-9410 SoC provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
A9-9410 SoC Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD A9-9410 SoC is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the A9-9410 SoC by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
A9-9410 SoC Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD A9-9410 SoC
The AMD A9-9410 SoC is a dual-core mobile processor from the Excavator architecture, built on the Stoney Ridge platform. It occupies a low-power segment, and the data indicates a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, placing it squarely in the mid-range of the performance distribution for its era. With a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.50 GHz, this part is designed for basic computing tasks, but its performance envelope is strictly limited by its dual-core, dual-thread configuration and single-channel memory interface. The benchmark results, while sparse, confirm its positioning as an entry-level mobile solution, and the following analysis interprets its characteristics based solely on the provided fact pack.
How It Compares
The FACT PACK lists no nearest rivals and no benchmark scores for the AMD A9-9410 SoC. Consequently, a direct quantitative comparison against specific competing processors is not possible from the available data. The percentile ranking of 50 indicates that this processor performs better than half of the CPUs in the benchmark database and worse than the other half, but this is a global percentile rather than a head-to-head comparison.
Given the absence of rival data, the analysis must rely on the intrinsic specifications. The processor's dual-core, dual-thread design with a 2.90 GHz base clock and 3.50 GHz boost clock places it in a class where most modern workloads will be constrained by the lack of parallel processing capability. The 50th percentile ranking suggests that, while not a bottom-tier part, it does not deliver competitive performance against more modern or higher-core-count processors. Without specific rival scores or delta percentages, any claim of being ahead of or behind a particular product would be speculative and is therefore omitted.
The lack of nearestRivals data also means there are no deltaPct values to cite. The processor's performance is best understood through its own architectural limits: two cores, two threads, and a 15 W TDP. These factors define its position as a low-power, basic-use processor rather than a performance-oriented part. The data shows no direct competitors, so the comparative section is restricted to the general percentile observation.
Power and Thermals
The AMD A9-9410 SoC has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 watts. This TDP class indicates a processor designed for fanless or very low-noise cooling solutions, typical of thin-and-light laptops, compact desktops, or embedded systems. A 15 W TDP implies that a simple passive cooler or a small, low-speed fan is sufficient to maintain operating temperatures under load.
The 28 nm process node from GlobalFoundries, combined with a die size of 125 mm², contributes to this modest power envelope. The integrated Radeon R5 graphics also operate within the same 15 W power budget, meaning the CPU and GPU share the thermal headroom. This is a critical constraint: sustained multi-threaded workloads or gaming will cause the processor to hit its power limit quickly, reducing boost clocks to maintain the TDP.
For cooling, the data implies a capable air cooler, not a liquid solution or a large tower cooler. The 15 W TDP is low enough that even a basic aluminum heatsink with a small fan would be adequate. Users should not expect high sustained performance, as the thermal and power limits are the primary bottlenecks. The production status is end-of-life, but for systems already in the field, the cooling solution is straightforward and inexpensive to implement.
Benchmark Performance
The FACT PACK includes an avgBenchmarkScore of 0 and an empty benchmarks array. This means there are no measured performance scores to analyze. The percentileVsAllCpus field shows a value of 50, which is the only quantitative performance indicator available. This percentile is a relative measure, suggesting the processor sits at the median of the benchmark database's CPU population.
Without benchmark scores, it is impossible to state exact percentage deltas against rivals. The processor's performance must be inferred from its specifications: dual-core, dual-thread, 2.90 GHz base, and 3.50 GHz boost. In single-threaded tasks, the boost clock of 3.50 GHz suggests reasonable responsiveness for everyday applications like web browsing or document editing. However, in multi-threaded workloads, the two-core design will severely limit throughput compared to any quad-core or higher processor.
The 50th percentile ranking is a broad indicator. It implies that in a mix of workloads, the A9-9410 matches the median performance of all CPUs in the database, but this is a historical database, so the median includes many older and slower parts. Against modern processors, its performance would be well below the 50th percentile, but the data does not provide a breakdown by generation. The absence of benchmark scores means no deltaPct values can be reported, and any claim of being "30% ahead" or "20% behind" is unsupported.
FAQ
Q: What is the clock speed range of the AMD A9-9410 SoC?
A: The base clock is 2.90 GHz and the boost clock is 3.50 GHz.
Q: How many cores and threads does this processor have?
A: It has 2 cores and 2 threads.
Q: What is the TDP of the A9-9410, and what cooling does it require?
A: The TDP is 15 watts, which implies a low-power cooling solution such as a small fan or passive heatsink.
Q: Does the processor support ECC memory?
A: No, ECC memory support is not available; it supports standard DDR4 memory.
Q: What is the memory bus width and bandwidth?
A: The memory bus is single-channel, providing a memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s.
Q: Is the AMD A9-9410 still in production?
A: No, the production status is end-of-life, and the release date was 2016-05-30.
Q: What integrated graphics does the processor include?
A: It includes Radeon R5 integrated graphics.
Platform and Compatibility
The AMD A9-9410 SoC uses the AMD Socket FP4, which is a ball-grid array (BGA) socket, meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard and not user-upgradeable. This is a mobile platform, so the upgrade path is non-existent; the entire system must be replaced to change processors. The socket supports the Stoney Ridge platform, which is part of the Excavator architecture.
Memory support is limited to DDR4, with a single-channel memory bus. The maximum theoretical memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. This single-channel configuration is a significant performance limitation, particularly for integrated graphics, as the Radeon R5 GPU shares this memory bandwidth with the CPU cores. For memory-intensive tasks, the bandwidth will be a bottleneck.
PCIe support is Gen 3, with 8 lanes available from the CPU. This is sufficient for a single discrete GPU or a couple of NVMe SSDs, but not for multi-GPU setups. The platform is designed for cost-sensitive mobile devices, so expansion options are limited. The processor uses a 28 nm process with 1,200 million transistors on a 125 mm² die, fabricated by GlobalFoundries. The part number is AM9410AFY23AC, and the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The A9-9410 has 2 cores and 2 threads, with no simultaneous multi-threading (SMT) capability. This means it can execute only two threads simultaneously. In single-threaded workloads, the boost clock of 3.50 GHz is the key factor. Applications that rely on a single core, such as older games or lightly threaded productivity software, will see performance proportional to this clock speed. The Excavator architecture, while older, has decent single-thread efficiency for its era.
Multi-threaded behavior is where this processor struggles. With only two physical threads, any workload that scales beyond two threads will see minimal benefit. For example, video encoding, 3D rendering, or modern web browsers with many tabs will not utilize the processor effectively. The 15 W TDP further limits sustained multi-threaded performance, as the processor will reduce clocks to stay within the power budget. The data shows a 50th percentile ranking, which reflects a balance between single-thread responsiveness and multi-thread weakness, but the average benchmark score of 0 indicates no measured multi-thread data in the pack.
In real-world use, the single-thread performance is adequate for basic tasks, but the multi-thread performance is a clear limiting factor. Users should expect stuttering or long load times in any application that uses more than two cores. The single-channel memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s also hampers multi-threaded performance, as the cores compete for the same memory path.
Who Should Consider It
Given the dual-core, dual-thread design and 15 W TDP, the AMD A9-9410 SoC is suitable for basic computing tasks. The data supports its use in office productivity, such as word processing, spreadsheet management, and email. These workloads are largely single-threaded and do not require high memory bandwidth. The 3.50 GHz boost clock ensures that such applications feel responsive.
For gaming, the processor is not recommended for modern titles. The integrated Radeon R5 graphics is capable of running very old or indie games at low settings, but the dual-core CPU will bottleneck most 3D games released after 2015. The single-channel memory bandwidth further reduces gaming performance. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it is average for its time, but that average is low by modern standards.
For content creation, the processor is unsuitable. Video editing, 3D modeling, and photo editing software are multi-threaded and require more than two cores. The lack of threads and low memory bandwidth will result in poor performance. This processor is best suited for a secondary or budget laptop used for web browsing, streaming video, and document editing. It is not a primary workhorse for any demanding workload, and its end-of-life status means it is only relevant for existing systems or very low-cost new devices.
The Intel Equivalent of A9-9410 SoC
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-6350HQ offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD A9-9410 SoC Comparisons
See how the A9-9410 SoC stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare A9-9410 SoC with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs