AMD A6-9220e SoC
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
Integrated GPUAt a Glance
AMDAMD A6-9220e SoC Specifications
A6-9220e SoC Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD A6-9220e SoC features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
A6-9220e SoC Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in A6-9220e SoC benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The A6-9220e SoC by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's A6-9220e SoC Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the A6-9220e SoC processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The A6-9220e SoC's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Excavator Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD A6-9220e SoC is built on AMD's 28 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in A6-9220e SoC incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Excavator Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The A6-9220e SoC by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
A6-9220e SoC Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD A6-9220e SoC has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket FT4 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The A6-9220e SoC uses the AMD Socket FT4 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket FT4 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the A6-9220e SoC define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the A6-9220e SoC determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's A6-9220e SoC Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD A6-9220e SoC includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the A6-9220e SoC provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
A6-9220e SoC Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD A6-9220e SoC is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the A6-9220e SoC by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
A6-9220e SoC Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD A6-9220e SoC
Benchmark Performance
The AMD A6-9220e SoC presents a unique data point in the mobile processor landscape. With no direct benchmark scores recorded in the database and an average benchmark score of zero, the performance profile must be inferred from its architectural specifications and market positioning. The processor sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs tracked, which is a deceptively neutral figure given the absence of measured results. This median percentile placement suggests that in the aggregate database, half of all processors score higher and half score lower, but the A6-9220e’s own contribution to that distribution is unverified.
The absence of nearest rivals in the comparative dataset further complicates direct performance analysis. Without deltaPct values or rival scores, the assessment relies on the fundamental specifications that shape computational throughput. The dual-core, dual-thread configuration with a base clock of 1600 MHz and boost clock of 2400 MHz positions this chip firmly in the entry-level mobile segment. The 6-watt TDP class is the single most telling specification, as it dictates the thermal envelope within which those clocks must operate. A 1600 MHz base clock with a 2400 MHz boost represents a 50% increase under load, but sustaining that boost on a 6-watt budget requires aggressive power management and likely results in bursty performance rather than sustained throughput.
The 28 nm process node from GlobalFoundries, housing 1,200 million transistors on a 125 mm² die, places this chip in a mature manufacturing generation. The Excavator architecture and Stoney Ridge codename indicate this is a refined iteration of AMD’s older mobile designs, not a cutting-edge part. The data implies that benchmark results, when they exist for comparable parts, would show this processor trailing modern entries by significant margins, but the lack of measured scores prevents quantifying that gap.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The asymmetry between single-thread and multi-thread capabilities is stark and instructive. With only two cores and two threads, there is no simultaneous multithreading—each core handles exactly one thread. This means multi-threaded workloads see a maximum of two concurrent execution streams, which is the bare minimum for any modern operating system and application environment. The base clock of 1600 MHz applies to all-core operation, while the 2400 MHz boost is likely achievable on a single core under favorable thermal conditions.
For single-threaded tasks, the 2400 MHz boost clock provides a modest but functional level of responsiveness. The Excavator architecture, while dated, includes sufficient instruction-level parallelism to handle everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and media playback at acceptable levels. The data shows a 50% clock differential between base and boost, which indicates that the processor can ramp up significantly when only one core is active. This behavior is typical of low-TDP mobile parts that prioritize burst performance for interactive tasks over sustained multi-core throughput.
Multi-threaded behavior is where the limitations become apparent. Two cores at 1600 MHz provide a combined throughput that is substantially lower than what modern quad-core or higher parts deliver. The single-channel memory bus with 17.1 GB/s bandwidth further constrains multi-threaded performance, as both cores must share the same memory path. For workloads that scale across cores—video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation—the A6-9220e would show a severe disadvantage. The data implies that this processor is optimized for latency-sensitive, single-threaded interactions rather than throughput-oriented parallel processing.
Power and Thermals
The 6-watt TDP is the defining characteristic of this processor and deserves careful scrutiny. This is an ultra-low-power design, comparable to the most efficient mobile parts in the market. The thermal implications are significant: a 6-watt processor can be cooled by passive solutions or ultra-small active coolers, enabling fanless designs in thin-and-light laptops and compact devices. The 28 nm process node, while not cutting-edge, is mature and well-characterized, allowing predictable thermal behavior.
The power envelope suggests that the base clock of 1600 MHz is the sustainable all-core frequency, while the 2400 MHz boost is a short-duration burst mode that the thermal solution can only tolerate for limited periods. The data indicates that sustained multi-threaded workloads would cause the processor to settle near the base clock to stay within the 6-watt budget. For single-threaded tasks, the boost can be maintained longer because only one core's power consumption scales up, but even then, the 6-watt limit imposes a ceiling on how high and how long the clock can rise.
Cooling tier implications are clear: this processor belongs in fanless or ultra-quiet designs. A capable air cooler would be overkill; the thermal solution required is minimal. The 125 mm² die size and 1,200 million transistors suggest the power density is low, which aids in heat dissipation. The end-of-life production status further indicates that AMD has moved on to more efficient architectures, but for the devices that shipped with this SoC, the thermal management requirements were modest and easily met.
How It Compares
The database lists no nearest rivals for the A6-9220e, which is itself a notable finding. This absence could indicate that the processor occupies a niche with few direct competitors, or that benchmark data for comparable parts has not been recorded. Without deltaPct values or rival scores, a quantitative comparison is impossible, but the specifications allow for qualitative positioning.
Within AMD’s own lineup, the A6-9220e sits below any Ryzen-class part in both core count and architecture generation. The Excavator architecture predates the Zen family, and the dual-core configuration is a fraction of what even entry-level Ryzen mobile parts offer. The 6-watt TDP is lower than most competitors, which is the primary selling point—not performance, but efficiency.
Against Intel’s low-power offerings, the A6-9220e would face competition from Atom and Celeron-class parts that also target the 6-watt range. The lack of measured scores prevents a direct head-to-head, but the architectural differences suggest that Intel’s newer low-power cores would outperform Excavator in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The A6-9220e’s integrated Radeon R4 graphics with 3 compute units provides a potential advantage in graphics performance over Intel’s older integrated solutions, but modern Intel iGPUs would likely match or exceed it.
The 50th percentile placement among all CPUs is the only comparative data point available, and it must be interpreted with caution given the zero benchmark score. This percentile likely reflects the processor’s position based on specifications rather than measured results, and the absence of rivals in the database suggests that the A6-9220e has been largely ignored by benchmarkers, likely due to its low-end positioning and end-of-life status.
Platform and Compatibility
The A6-9220e uses the AMD Socket FT4, a platform designed for ultra-mobile and compact devices. This socket is associated with AMD’s Stoney Ridge and Bristol Ridge APUs, and it supports DDR4 memory in a single-channel configuration. The single-channel memory bus with 17.1 GB/s bandwidth is a significant limitation, as it halves the memory throughput compared to dual-channel designs. For integrated graphics, this bandwidth constraint directly impacts frame rates and graphical performance, as the Radeon R4 GPU must share the same memory path as the CPU.
PCIe support is listed as Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This provides adequate connectivity for an NVMe solid-state drive and basic peripheral expansion, though the lane count is lower than desktop platforms. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is expected for a consumer mobile part. The single-channel memory support and 8 PCIe lanes indicate that this platform is designed for basic productivity and media consumption, not high-bandwidth workloads.
The architecture is Excavator on the Stoney Ridge codename, manufactured on a 28 nm process by GlobalFoundries. This is a mature platform with known characteristics, but it is also end-of-life, meaning no future upgrades are available within this socket. The upgrade path is null: users cannot swap in a faster processor without changing the entire platform. The release date of January 6, 2019, places this part at the tail end of the Excavator era, just as AMD was transitioning its mobile lineup to Zen-based architectures.
The part number AM922CANN23AC identifies this specific SKU, and the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking. The integrated Radeon R4 graphics with 3 compute units provides basic display output and hardware acceleration for video playback, but it is not designed for gaming or graphics-intensive tasks. The 160 KB L1 cache and 1 MB shared L2 cache are modest but appropriate for the dual-core design.
FAQ
Q: What is the TDP of the AMD A6-9220e?
A: The TDP is 6 watts, placing it in the ultra-low-power category suitable for fanless designs.
Q: How many cores and threads does the A6-9220e have?
A: It has 2 cores and 2 threads, with no simultaneous multithreading support.
Q: What is the boost clock speed?
A: The boost clock is 2400 MHz, while the base clock is 1600 MHz.
Q: Does the A6-9220e support dual-channel memory?
A: No, it supports single-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s.
Q: What integrated graphics does it include?
A: It includes Radeon R4 graphics with 3 compute units.
Q: Is the A6-9220e still in production?
A: No, it is marked as end-of-life, and it was released on January 6, 2019.
Who Should Consider It
The A6-9220e is a processor for a very specific use case: ultra-portable, fanless, and efficiency-focused devices where battery life and silent operation trump raw performance. The 6-watt TDP and 2400 MHz boost clock make it suitable for basic productivity tasks like word processing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, where single-threaded performance is sufficient and multi-core demands are minimal. The integrated Radeon R4 graphics can handle video playback and casual 2D gaming, but the single-channel memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s will limit any graphical ambition.
For content creation workloads—video editing, 3D rendering, photo manipulation—the dual-core configuration and low base clock are severe handicaps. The 1600 MHz all-core speed means any multi-threaded task will take significantly longer than on even entry-level quad-core parts. The lack of measured benchmarks in the database suggests that few users have pushed this processor in such directions, and the specifications confirm why.
Office productivity is the sweet spot. The 2400 MHz boost clock provides responsive single-threaded performance for applications that are primarily latency-bound, and the 6-watt TDP enables long battery life in thin-and-light laptops. The end-of-life status means that new devices with this processor are no longer being manufactured, but used and refurbished units could serve as budget-friendly options for users with modest computing needs. The 50th percentile placement among all CPUs, while based on incomplete data, indicates that this processor is not an outlier in either direction—it is a middle-of-the-road part for its era, but that era has passed.
The Intel Equivalent of A6-9220e SoC
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-9400F offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD A6-9220e SoC Comparisons
See how the A6-9220e SoC stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare A6-9220e SoC with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs