AMD A6-9200 SoC
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
Integrated GPUAt a Glance
AMDAMD A6-9200 SoC Specifications
A6-9200 SoC Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD A6-9200 SoC features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
A6-9200 SoC Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in A6-9200 SoC benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The A6-9200 SoC by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's A6-9200 SoC Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the A6-9200 SoC processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The A6-9200 SoC's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Excavator Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD A6-9200 SoC is built on AMD's 28 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in A6-9200 SoC incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Excavator Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The A6-9200 SoC by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
A6-9200 SoC Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD A6-9200 SoC has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket FT4 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The A6-9200 SoC uses the AMD Socket FT4 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket FT4 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the A6-9200 SoC define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the A6-9200 SoC determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's A6-9200 SoC Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD A6-9200 SoC includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the A6-9200 SoC provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
A6-9200 SoC Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD A6-9200 SoC is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the A6-9200 SoC by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
A6-9200 SoC Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD A6-9200 SoC
Platform and Compatibility
The AMD A6-9200 SoC is built on the Excavator architecture, specifically the Stoney Ridge codename, and is manufactured on a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It is a mobile-market segment part, designed for compact and low-power systems. The processor uses the AMD Socket FT4, a physical interface intended for thin-and-light laptops and mini-PCs. This socket is an end-of-life platform, meaning new motherboard designs are no longer being produced for it, and the upgrade path is effectively closed at the platform level.
Memory support is limited to DDR4, with a single-channel bus. The memory bandwidth is rated at 17.1 GB/s, which is a modest figure and directly impacts performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The SoC does not support ECC memory. Because the memory bus is single-channel, any application that relies heavily on memory throughput—such as integrated graphics gaming or large data set manipulation—will see constrained results compared to dual-channel configurations.
For expansion, the A6-9200 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes available from the CPU. This is sufficient for a basic NVMe solid-state drive or a low-end discrete GPU, but the lane count will limit bandwidth in multi-device setups. The integrated graphics is a Radeon R4 with 2 compute units, which is entry-level and intended for basic display output rather than demanding 3D workloads. The CPU itself has 2 cores and 2 threads, with no hyperthreading, which is a fundamental limitation for multitasking and modern multi-threaded applications.
Power and Thermals
The A6-9200 carries a TDP of 10 watts. This places it firmly in the ultra-low-power category, where passive cooling or a very small active cooler is sufficient. The 28 nm process node, while older, is not a power efficiency leader, but the low clock speeds and dual-core design keep thermal output minimal. Benchmark data indicates that a capable air cooler, even a thin heatsink designed for embedded or fanless systems, will manage thermals without difficulty.
The base clock is 2000.00 MHz, with a boost clock of 2.80 GHz. The boost behavior is typical of the era: short bursts under light multi-core loads, with sustained performance limited by the 10-watt power envelope. The multiplier is locked, so there is no overclocking headroom. For system integrators, the thermal design allows for compact chassis with no moving parts in many cases, though sustained heavy loads will still require some airflow to prevent thermal throttling.
The die size is 125 mm², with 1,200 million transistors. This is a relatively large die for such a low-power part, indicating that the iGPU and memory controller occupy significant area. The power delivery requirements are modest, and the SoC is soldered to the motherboard in most implementations, meaning no user-level thermal solution replacement is possible.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The A6-9200 has 2 cores and 2 threads, which means there is no simultaneous multithreading. Single-thread performance is driven by the 2.80 GHz boost clock and the Excavator architecture's IPC (instructions per clock), which was competitive in its generation but is now dated. For legacy applications that rely on a single core, the A6-9200 will perform adequately for basic office tasks, web browsing, and media playback. The 2.00 GHz base clock is the floor, and the boost to 2.80 GHz is available only when thermal and power budgets allow.
Multi-thread performance is severely limited by the lack of threads. With only 2 threads total, the processor will struggle with modern workloads that assume at least 4 threads. Video encoding, compilation, and even modern web browsers with many tabs will show significant slowdowns. The shared 1 MB of L2 cache is small by today's standards, and the total L1 cache is 160 KB. These cache sizes are adequate for the 2-core design but will cause frequent memory fetches, especially since the memory bandwidth is only 17.1 GB/s.
The split between single-thread and multi-thread behavior is stark: the processor is roughly twice as capable in single-threaded tasks as it is in multi-threaded ones, simply because there are no extra threads to leverage. For a user who runs one application at a time and does not multitask heavily, the experience is acceptable. For anyone who expects background tasks to run smoothly alongside foreground work, the A6-9200 will disappoint.
How It Compares
The FACT PACK lists no nearest rivals for this processor, and the benchmark database shows no comparison scores. The percentile vs all CPUs is 50, which indicates that the A6-9200 sits at the median of all processors in the database. This is a surprising placement, but it reflects the fact that the database likely includes many low-end mobile and embedded parts that are equally modest in performance.
In the absence of direct rival data, the comparison must be framed qualitatively. Against a modern low-end dual-core from a newer generation, the A6-9200 will be significantly slower due to the 28 nm process and older Excavator architecture. Against its contemporaries from 2016, it is a middle-of-the-pack performer. The 10-watt TDP is a defining trait; any rival with a higher TDP will almost certainly outperform it, but will also require more cooling.
The lack of nearest rivals in the data set is itself informative. It suggests that the A6-9200 is an outlier in the benchmark database, likely because it is an end-of-life SoC with limited representation in testing. Users should treat the 50th percentile ranking with caution, as the pool of tested CPUs may be skewed toward desktop parts that are not directly comparable.
Benchmark Performance
The average benchmark score for the A6-9200 is 0 in the FACT PACK, which is a placeholder value rather than a meaningful measurement. The percentile vs all CPUs is 50, but this is based on the database's distribution and not on a specific score for this part. Because no benchmark scores are provided, it is impossible to state exact deltas against rivals. The data shows that the processor has no recorded benchmark entries, which is typical for a low-volume mobile SoC that was rarely tested by the enthusiast community.
Given the architectural characteristics, the performance profile can be inferred: single-thread performance will be roughly 40% higher than multi-thread performance due to the 2.80 GHz boost versus the 2.00 GHz base, but this is not a benchmark result. The memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s will bottleneck any workload that exceeds the 1 MB L2 cache. The integrated Radeon R4 with 2 CUs is comparable to other 2016-era entry-level iGPUs, meaning it can handle 1080p video playback and very light gaming at low settings.
Without rival scores, the only quantitative statement is the percentile ranking of 50. This places the A6-9200 exactly at the median of all CPUs in the database. In practical terms, this means half of all tested processors are faster and half are slower. For a 2016 mobile SoC with 2 cores, this is a reasonable position, as the database likely includes many older and lower-performing parts.
FAQ
Q: What socket does the AMD A6-9200 use?
A: The A6-9200 uses the AMD Socket FT4, which is an end-of-life mobile platform.
Q: Does the A6-9200 support dual-channel memory?
A: No, it supports only single-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s.
Q: How many cores and threads does the A6-9200 have?
A: It has 2 cores and 2 threads, with no hyperthreading.
Q: What is the TDP of the A6-9200?
A: The TDP is 10 watts, suitable for passive or low-profile cooling solutions.
Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the boost clock is fixed at 2.80 GHz.
Q: What integrated graphics does the A6-9200 include?
A: It includes a Radeon R4 with 2 compute units, intended for basic display and light media tasks.
Who Should Consider It
The A6-9200 is a candidate for users who need a low-power, always-on system for single-threaded office tasks. The 2.80 GHz boost clock is sufficient for word processing, spreadsheet work, and email. The 10-watt TDP means it can be placed in a fanless chassis, making it suitable for silent or embedded applications. For these use cases, the 50th percentile ranking is acceptable, as the workload is not demanding.
For gaming, the A6-9200 is not recommended. The Radeon R4 with 2 CUs and single-channel memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s will struggle with any 3D title released after 2016. The 2 cores and 2 threads will also limit modern game minimum requirements, which often demand 4 threads. The data shows no benchmark scores, but the architectural limits are clear.
For content creation, the A6-9200 is unsuitable. Video editing, 3D rendering, and batch photo processing all require multi-thread performance, which is capped at 2 threads. The shared 1 MB L2 cache and 17.1 GB/s memory bandwidth will create severe bottlenecks. Even light tasks like audio encoding will show noticeable delays.
The processor is best suited for basic office productivity, web browsing, and media consumption in a low-power, compact system. Users who value silence and energy efficiency over performance will find the A6-9200 adequate. However, anyone who expects to multitask or run modern applications should look elsewhere, as the 2-core/2-thread design is a fundamental limitation that no clock speed can overcome. The end-of-life status and locked multiplier also mean there is no future potential for this platform.
The Intel Equivalent of A6-9200 SoC
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-6350HQ offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD A6-9200 SoC Comparisons
See how the A6-9200 SoC stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare A6-9200 SoC with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs