AMD A4-9125 SoC
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
Integrated GPUAt a Glance
AMDAMD A4-9125 SoC Specifications
A4-9125 SoC Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD A4-9125 SoC features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
A4-9125 SoC Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in A4-9125 SoC benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The A4-9125 SoC by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's A4-9125 SoC Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the A4-9125 SoC processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The A4-9125 SoC's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Excavator Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD A4-9125 SoC is built on AMD's 28 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in A4-9125 SoC incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Excavator Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The A4-9125 SoC by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
A4-9125 SoC Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD A4-9125 SoC has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 15W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket FT4 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The A4-9125 SoC uses the AMD Socket FT4 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket FT4 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the A4-9125 SoC define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the A4-9125 SoC determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's A4-9125 SoC Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD A4-9125 SoC includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the A4-9125 SoC provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
A4-9125 SoC Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD A4-9125 SoC is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the A4-9125 SoC by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
A4-9125 SoC Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD A4-9125 SoC
The AMD A4-9125 SoC is an end-of-life mobile processor from AMD’s Stoney Ridge line, built on the Excavator architecture at GlobalFoundries on a 28 nm process. It has two cores and two threads, a 2.30 GHz base clock, a 2.60 GHz boost clock, integrated Radeon R3 graphics with 2 compute units, and a 15 W TDP. It uses AMD Socket FT4, single-channel DDR4 memory, and PCIe Gen 3 with 8 CPU-attached lanes. In the benchmark database, its average benchmark score is 0, its nearest-rivals list is empty, and its all-CPU percentile is 50.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark record for this SoC is empty. The benchmarks array contains no test scores, and the average benchmark score is 0. There are therefore no measured performance results to interpret, and because the nearestRivals array is empty, there are no exact deltaPct values for comparisons against other CPUs. The only positional figure in the database is percentileVsAllCpus = 50, which places the processor at the midpoint of the all-CPU distribution. That percentile should be read carefully: with an average score of 0 and no benchmark entries, the 50th-percentile value is not backed by a measured workload result. It is a placeholder position rather than a validated performance ranking.
This means the database does not support any specific claim about how fast the A4-9125 is in a given application. No score exists to compare against a rival, and no percentage lead or deficit can be calculated. The absence of data is itself the important result: benchmark results do not validate any performance expectation. Anyone evaluating this SoC must work from the architectural facts instead: two threads, a 2.30 GHz base clock, a 2.60 GHz boost clock, single-channel DDR4, and integrated graphics. Those are the only performance-relevant data points in the fact pack.
How It Compares
There are no nearest rivals recorded for the AMD A4-9125. The nearestRivals array is empty, so the comparison section cannot name another CPU, list a rival score, or cite a percentage difference. The only comparison datapoint is the all-CPU percentile, which is 50. In a ranked database, that is the middle position. However, because the average benchmark score is 0 and the benchmarks array is empty, that midpoint placement cannot be treated as a measured performance ranking. It is the position assigned by the database’s percentile system, not a score-derived result.
Relative to the broader CPU field, the A4-9125 has no confirmed lead or deficit against any named part. Relative to AMD’s own current catalog, the production status is end-of-life, and the series field is null, so the database does not associate this SoC with an active AMD product family. The practical comparison verdict is simple: this is a data-sheet entry with a midpoint percentile, no benchmark score, and no named rivals. Any statement about it beating or losing to another processor would go beyond the available facts.
Platform and Compatibility
The A4-9125 is designed for AMD Socket FT4. Memory support is DDR4 through a single-channel interface, and the listed memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The processor provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking through the CPU ratio is not an option. The integrated Radeon R3 graphics block with 2 compute units is part of the same SoC package as the two CPU cores.
Manufacturing details are fully listed in the fact pack: the SoC is built on a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with 1,200 million transistors and a die size of 125 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 160 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of shared L2 cache; there is no L3 cache and no 3D V-Cache listed. The part number AM9125AYN23AC identifies this specific version. Production status is end-of-life, and the market segment is mobile.
For upgrade planning, the database records no other Socket FT4 processors in the nearest-rivals list for this part, so no socket-compatible upgrade path can be named from these data. What is documented is the socket, memory type, memory bus width, memory bandwidth, PCIe generation, PCIe lane count, and the fact that the processor is an integrated SoC rather than a discrete CPU with a separate chipset. Users should treat platform compatibility as fixed to the FT4 socket and to the limitations of the integrated design.
Who Should Consider It
The A4-9125 is suited to workloads that fit within two threads and integrated graphics. The CPU has two cores and two threads, so there is no extra logical-thread capacity from simultaneous multithreading. The 2.30 GHz base clock and 2.60 GHz boost clock define the available compute speed. Light office-style tasks, document work, web browsing, and media playback are the kind of workloads that can operate in this kind of envelope, although the fact pack contains no office or media benchmark scores to confirm performance.
Gaming is a limited case. The SoC includes Radeon R3 graphics with 2 compute units, and memory is single-channel DDR4 at 17.1 GB/s, but no gaming benchmark scores are recorded. The database cannot verify whether this part handles any specific game. For creation work, the two-thread limit is the defining constraint; heavily threaded rendering or video workloads require more threads than this SoC offers. The data shows no score for such tasks, and the hardware structure puts a hard ceiling at two simultaneous threads. Users whose workloads are short, lightly threaded, and able to use the 2.60 GHz boost clock are the most plausible fit. Users needing sustained multi-threaded processing have no evidence in this record that the A4-9125 can provide it.
Power and Thermals
The TDP is 15 W. That is a low-power thermal class, consistent with the mobile market segment and with the SoC’s integrated design. The 28 nm manufacturing process, the 125 mm² die, and the 1,200 million transistor count define the physical implementation, but the only thermal figure in the fact pack is the 15 W TDP. No cooler model, cooler size, or power draw figure is provided, so thermal guidance must come from the TDP class alone.
A 15 W SoC does not require a high-end cooling solution. The integrated Radeon R3 graphics also operates within the same thermal envelope, though the fact pack does not split power between CPU and graphics. The multiplier is locked, which means users cannot adjust clock ratios for lower or higher power through that route. This is a part for compact or low-power mobile systems where modest heat output is a feature, not a limitation. Its end-of-life status also means users are more likely to encounter it in existing systems rather than in new builds, so cooling choices will mostly be dictated by the original chassis design and the FT4 socket layout.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The core topology is two cores and two threads, meaning each core handles a single thread. The base clock is 2.30 GHz and the boost clock is 2.60 GHz. For single-thread workloads, the part can operate at the 2.60 GHz boost ceiling. For multi-thread workloads, scaling is capped by the thread count of two, not by frequency. The shared 1 MB L2 cache is available to both cores, while the 160 KB L1 cache is listed without a per-core breakdown. There is no L3 cache and no 3D V-Cache, so the cache hierarchy is shallow by design.
Memory bandwidth is also a factor in both cases. The single-channel DDR4 interface provides 17.1 GB/s, which limits how fast data can be fed into either one thread or two threads. In practice, this split means the A4-9125 is better suited to short, lightly threaded bursts where the 2.60 GHz boost clock can matter, rather than sustained all-core compute. The database contains no per-thread benchmark scores, but the structural facts — two threads, 2.30 GHz base, 2.60 GHz boost, 1 MB shared L2, no L3, single-channel memory — define the behavior. There is no multi-thread advantage from extra logical processors, and there is no L3 cache to reduce repeated memory access. The practical reading is that single-thread performance is the stronger of the two cases, and even that is bounded by the 2.60 GHz maximum clock and the integrated Radeon R3 2CU sharing the same SoC.
The Intel Equivalent of A4-9125 SoC
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-110 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD A4-9125 SoC Comparisons
See how the A4-9125 SoC stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare A4-9125 SoC with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs