GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1755 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T600 Mobile

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1410 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
74,748
35,486
geekbench_vulkan
75,235
30,211
passmark_directx_10
79
N/A
passmark_directx_11
130
N/A
passmark_directx_12
61
N/A
passmark_directx_9
184
N/A
passmark_g2d
633
N/A
passmark_g3d
14,423
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,947
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile

Reviewing the test figures for the RTX 4050 and GeForce NVIDIA T600 Mobile, an obvious trend emerges. the RTX 4050 repeatedly delivers superior scores in this evaluation. The performance advantage extends from noticeable to outstanding depending on the specific title. Such steadiness points to fundamental design improvements. Those seeking gaming power should pay attention.

Gaming tests in diverse scenarios steadily advantage the RTX 4050. From competitive titles to blockbuster games, the RTX 4050 holds its superiority. The benchmark steadiness in various scenarios demonstrates fundamental technical advantages. Players will anticipate solid frame rates no matter of title. This versatility is impressive.

GeForce NVIDIA T600 Mobile encounters issues to compete with the RTX 4050's raw throughput. For value-focused consumers, GeForce NVIDIA T600 Mobile might yet provide sufficient results, however those wanting top-tier experience will look toward the RTX 4050. This frame rate delta is significantly considerable to dismiss. Heavy workloads especially reveal this gap. This premium provides dividends in visual quality.

When all is said and done: the RTX 4050 claims this showdown clearly. Users wanting gaming capability will certainly favor the RTX 4050 over GeForce NVIDIA T600 Mobile. This benchmark numbers confirms this assessment. The scenarios might execute significantly better. It's a obvious winner in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4050 Mobile
T600 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
896 -65.0%
Shaders
2,560
896 -65.0%
TMUs
80
56 -30.0%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
20
14 -30.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1455 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1410 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
4,096 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
96 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
45.12 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
78.96 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
2.527 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
78.96 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
5.053 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
20
Tensor Cores
80
Power
TDP
50 W
40 W
TDP (W)
50
40 -20.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
GPU Name
AD107
TU117
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Quadro Turing-M (Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
4,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
118.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Quadro Pascal-M
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
Ampere-MW
View GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Details View T600 Mobile Details