GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro 5300

CORE STATE Navi 14
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 85 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A5500

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1665 MHz
TDP 230 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
49,318
N/A
geekbench_opencl
38,747
174,637
geekbench_vulkan
35,793
155,797

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

If analyzing NVIDIA RTX A5500 versus AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5300, a performance difference grows immediately apparent. NVIDIA RTX A5500 takes the crown in essentially every scenario we ran. The difference is significant enough to affect practical rendering performance. Users can experience enhanced gameplay. The verdict is clear.

Playing games tests in multiple scenarios reliably advantage NVIDIA RTX A5500. From multiplayer genres to demanding productions, NVIDIA RTX A5500 preserves its superiority. The gaming reliability in different workloads demonstrates core engineering improvements. Gamers will rely on strong experiences independent of game type. The flexibility is impressive.

The graphics memory superiority of NVIDIA RTX A5500 becomes increasingly important at elevated detail settings. Ultra HD gaming consumes significant graphics memory, and NVIDIA RTX A5500 provides more capacity. The translates into better frame rates in VRAM-hungry scenarios. Upcoming releases will only demand greater video memory. The benefit expands over time.

Overall, NVIDIA RTX A5500 offers the more capable pick in this comparison. The frame rate edges validate evaluation for those assembling a demanding rendering rig. Although AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5300 possesses its merits, the test numbers definitely supports NVIDIA RTX A5500. Reach your choice accordingly. This gaming margin is notable enough to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro 5300
RTX A5500
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
10,240 +700.0%
Shaders
1,280
10,240 +700.0%
TMUs
80
320 +300.0%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
Compute Units
20
SM Count
80
Clocks
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1080 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1665 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
24,576 +500.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
768.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
159.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.224 TFLOPS
34.10 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
264.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
532.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.448 TFLOPS (2:1)
34.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
80
Tensor Cores
320
Power
TDP
85 W
230 W
TDP (W)
85
230 +170.6%
Suggested PSU
250 W
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 14
GA102
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
7 nm
8 nm
Transistors
6,400 million
28,300 million
Die Size
158 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
40.5M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon Pro 5300 Details View RTX A5500 Details