GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

CORE STATE Navi 10
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1350 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
60,126
N/A
geekbench_opencl
52,787
141,837
geekbench_vulkan
51,289
129,980
passmark_directx_10
71
N/A
passmark_directx_11
78
N/A
passmark_directx_12
48
N/A
passmark_directx_9
143
N/A
passmark_g2d
805
N/A
passmark_g3d
11,583
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
4,961
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,196

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

Reviewing the test data for NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (AMD), a definite trend emerges. NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics steadily produces superior FPS in every testing. This benchmark lead ranges from significant to exceptional based on the specific scenario. Such steadiness points to inherent engineering benefits. Consumers valuing graphics power might consider this.

For real-time ray tracing, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics moves considerably forward of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (AMD). The RT hardware handle heavy lighting computations significantly more smoothly. Enthusiasts seeking cutting-edge fidelity might certainly choose NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics. This ray tracing advantage is notable. Next-gen titles more and more take advantage of real-time ray tracing capabilities.

The graphics memory superiority of NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics turns particularly significant at demanding settings. Ultra HD gaming consumes significant memory, and NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics provides more capacity. The leads into better gameplay in heavy workloads. Future titles can increasingly need more graphics memory. This superiority increases over releases.

Ultimately: NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics takes this battle clearly. Consumers seeking gaming capability would seriously favor NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 graphics over AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (AMD). This test results demonstrates this conclusion. Your scenarios should render substantially more fluidly. This is a straightforward choice in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro 5700
RTX A4500
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
7,168 +211.1%
Shaders
2,304
7,168 +211.1%
TMUs
144
224 +55.6%
ROPs
64
96 +50.0%
Compute Units
36
SM Count
56
Clocks
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
20 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
20,480 +150.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
384.0 GB/s
640.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.221 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
369.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)
23.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
56
Tensor Cores
224
Power
TDP
130 W
200 W
TDP (W)
130
200 +53.8%
Suggested PSU
300 W
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 10
GA102
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
7 nm
8 nm
Transistors
10,300 million
28,300 million
Die Size
251 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
41.0M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon Pro 5700 Details View RTX A4500 Details