GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

CORE STATE Navi 12
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1144 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 2048 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
55,030
N/A
geekbench_opencl
47,783
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
46,425
22,237
passmark_directx_10
62
N/A
passmark_directx_11
59
N/A
passmark_directx_12
39
N/A
passmark_directx_9
118
N/A
passmark_g2d
679
N/A
passmark_g3d
9,279
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
4,031
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

If analyzing AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD versus NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA, the performance gap becomes clearly evident. AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD takes the advantage in almost each game we performed. The gap is significant sufficiently to influence real-world graphics performance. Gamers might feel improved gameplay. This conclusion is evident.

Game performance benchmarks across various resolutions repeatedly advantage AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD. Whether it's fast-paced scenarios to demanding games, AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD keeps its superiority. This frame rate dependability in multiple games shows fundamental engineering benefits. Gamers should count on strong results no matter of scenario. The versatility is remarkable.

NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA encounters issues to compete with AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD's absolute capability. In cost-sensitive consumers, NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA can nevertheless offer adequate frame rates, but people demanding the best experience might invest toward AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD. This benchmark gap is sufficiently large to deny. Heavy titles notably reveal this difference. This price gap pays rewards in frame rates.

All things considered, AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD provides the superior option in this matchup. Its gaming superiority validate consideration for anyone putting together a demanding visual system. While NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA possesses its positives, the score figures definitely benefits AMD Radeon Pro 5600M from AMD. Reach your choice based on this. This benchmark difference is notable sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro 5600M
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
768 -70.0%
Shaders
2,560
768 -70.0%
TMUs
160
24 -85.0%
ROPs
64
16 -75.0%
Compute Units
40
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
822 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
1144 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz 1540 Mbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR6
Memory Bus
2048 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
394.2 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
73.22 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
183.0 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.857 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
366.1 GFLOPS (1:16)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
11.71 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
Tensor Cores
24
Power
TDP
50 W
50 W
TDP (W)
50
50 0.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 12
GA107
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
7 nm
8 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
Die Size
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.3
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.0
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon Pro 5600M Details View RTX A400 Details