GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

CORE STATE GB202

VRAM 32 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz

TDP 575 W

BUS WIDTH 512 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A500 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107S

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1537 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

18,355

N/A

geekbench_opencl

334,370

41,263

geekbench_vulkan

376,728

37,873

passmark_directx_10

226

N/A

passmark_directx_11

341

N/A

passmark_directx_12

185

N/A

passmark_directx_9

395

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,413

N/A

passmark_g3d

39,650

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

26,756

N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

Gaming performance tests between Radeon RTX 5090 and Radeon NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile show a obvious winner. Radeon RTX 5090 provides substantially higher FPS in contemporary titles. The video memory edge and architectural enhancements translate into visibly better gameplay quality. Score figures demonstrates this conclusion. Players looking for top-tier visuals will take note.

Radeon NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile encounters issues to compete with Radeon RTX 5090's absolute throughput. In cost-sensitive builders, Radeon NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile might still represent sufficient frame rates, but those needing the best quality should invest toward Radeon RTX 5090. The performance delta is significantly notable to ignore. Demanding workloads specifically highlight this gap. The cost difference returns benefits in capability.

Ultimately: Radeon RTX 5090 claims this showdown convincingly. Users wanting rendering throughput will strongly consider Radeon RTX 5090 over Radeon NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile. This score results confirms this verdict. Your games might render considerably faster. It's a straightforward victor in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 5090

RTX A500 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

21,760

2,048 -90.6%

Shaders

21,760

2,048 -90.6%

TMUs

680

64 -90.6%

ROPs

176

32 -81.8%

SM Count

170

16 -90.6%

Clocks

Base Clock

2017 MHz

832 MHz

Boost Clock

2407 MHz

1537 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

32 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

32,768

4,096 -87.5%

Memory Type

GDDR7

GDDR6

Memory Bus

512 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

1.79 TB/s

96.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

96 MB

2 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

423.6 GPixel/s

49.18 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

1,636.8 GTexel/s

98.37 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

104.8 TFLOPS

6.296 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)

98.37 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)

6.296 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

170

16 -90.6%

Tensor Cores

680

64 -90.6%

Power

TDP

575 W

30 W

TDP (W)

575

30 -94.8%

Suggested PSU

950 W

—

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

None

Architecture

Blackwell 2.0

Ampere

GPU Name

GB202

GA107S

Generation

GeForce 50

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

92,200 million

8,700 million

Die Size

750 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

122.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

12.0

8.6

Shader Model

6.9

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

IGP

Length

304 mm 12 inches

—

Height

137 mm 5.4 inches

—

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

1,999 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

GeForce 40

Quadro Turing-M

Successor

GeForce 60

Ada-MW

View GeForce RTX 5090 Details View RTX A500 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

RTX A500 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons