GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2512 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
5,077
geekbench_opencl
23,468
172,660
geekbench_vulkan
21,965
178,923
passmark_directx_10
N/A
180
passmark_directx_11
N/A
277
passmark_directx_12
N/A
108
passmark_directx_9
N/A
320
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,305
passmark_g3d
N/A
29,137
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
15,787

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Analyzing the test results for RTX 5070 by NVIDIA and AMD Radeon 680M by AMD, a clear pattern unfolds. RTX 5070 by NVIDIA reliably delivers superior scores in this benchmarking. The speed advantage varies from significant to impressive depending on the given game. Such steadiness points to fundamental design superiority. Those wanting graphics throughput might take note.

AMD Radeon 680M by AMD has difficulty to match RTX 5070 by NVIDIA's absolute power. In cost-sensitive buyers, AMD Radeon 680M by AMD can nonetheless deliver acceptable capability, but those seeking the best experience would invest toward RTX 5070 by NVIDIA. The benchmark margin is significantly substantial to deny. Intensive titles particularly demonstrate this gap. The cost difference pays rewards in capability.

For real-time ray tracing, RTX 5070 by NVIDIA leaps further beyond of AMD Radeon 680M by AMD. Its dedicated hardware execute intensive shadow rendering far more smoothly. Users demanding cutting-edge effects would seriously consider RTX 5070 by NVIDIA. This hardware RT performance is notable. Contemporary AAA games increasingly leverage hardware RT effects.

Overall, RTX 5070 by NVIDIA delivers the stronger pick in this analysis. Its performance leads validate examination for buyers assembling a high-performance graphics rig. Though AMD Radeon 680M by AMD features its advantages, this performance figures obviously favors RTX 5070 by NVIDIA. Make your decision accordingly. The gaming margin is substantial sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
RTX 5070
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
6,144 +700.0%
Shaders
768
6,144 +700.0%
TMUs
48
192 +300.0%
ROPs
32
80 +150.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
48
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2325 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2512 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
201.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
482.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
30.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
482.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
30.87 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
48 +300.0%
Tensor Cores
192
Power
TDP
50 W
250 W
TDP (W)
50
250 +400.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
GB205
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
GeForce 50
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
31,100 million
Die Size
208 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
245 mm 9.6 inches
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
GeForce 40
Successor
Navi III IGP
GeForce 60
View Radeon 680M Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Details