GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5060

CORE STATE GB206
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2497 MHz
TDP 145 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
3,628
geekbench_opencl
23,468
112,787
geekbench_vulkan
21,965
113,321
passmark_directx_10
N/A
127
passmark_directx_11
N/A
200
passmark_directx_12
N/A
77
passmark_directx_9
N/A
225
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,154
passmark_g3d
N/A
20,891
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
10,899

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Throughout this graphics card matchup, RTX 5060 from NVIDIA proves its superiority clearly. If you're rendering at high resolutions, RTX 5060 from NVIDIA reliably exceeds AMD's AMD Radeon 680M by considerable gaps. This benchmark gap increases especially wider at increased quality levels. The GPU handles intensive scenarios with capability. Its architectural benefits are obvious.

Game performance benchmarks over diverse resolutions consistently favor RTX 5060 from NVIDIA. Whether it's fast-paced games to AAA titles, RTX 5060 from NVIDIA holds its superiority. This frame rate consistency throughout various workloads indicates underlying architectural advantages. Enthusiasts will count on capable performance regardless of genre. This versatility is notable.

Game performance results across diverse titles reliably favor RTX 5060 from NVIDIA. From multiplayer games to demanding titles, RTX 5060 from NVIDIA holds its superiority. This frame rate consistency throughout diverse workloads proves underlying design superiority. Users can expect solid frame rates regardless of game type. This versatility is notable.

Ultimately: RTX 5060 from NVIDIA secures this comparison convincingly. Users wanting visual power would definitely favor RTX 5060 from NVIDIA over AMD's AMD Radeon 680M. This test results validates this recommendation. The games will perform noticeably smoother. It's a straightforward champion in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
RTX 5060
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
3,840 +400.0%
Shaders
768
3,840 +400.0%
TMUs
48
120 +150.0%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
30
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2280 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2497 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
119.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
299.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
19.18 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
299.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
19.18 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
30 +150.0%
Tensor Cores
120
Power
TDP
50 W
145 W
TDP (W)
50
145 +190.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
GB206
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
GeForce 50
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
21,900 million
Die Size
208 mm²
181 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
121.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
241 mm 9.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
299 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
GeForce 40
Successor
Navi III IGP
GeForce 60
View Radeon 680M Details View GeForce RTX 5060 Details