GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A380

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 75 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz
TDP 120 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
808
N/A
geekbench_opencl
38,224
180,831
geekbench_vulkan
36,736
170,774
passmark_directx_10
37
173
passmark_directx_11
38
262
passmark_directx_12
35
107
passmark_directx_9
73
310
passmark_g2d
610
984
passmark_g3d
6,252
27,212
passmark_gpu_compute
2,762
12,347

Analysis: Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Examining the test figures for Radeon RTX 4090 and Arc A380 from Intel, a distinct trend develops. Radeon RTX 4090 steadily produces superior scores in our evaluation. This performance advantage ranges from noticeable to remarkable according to the given scenario. This dependability testifies to underlying design improvements. Those valuing visual throughput might factor this in.

Gaming tests across different games steadily advantage Radeon RTX 4090. Whether it's esports games to heavy games, Radeon RTX 4090 preserves its edge. This benchmark reliability in different games demonstrates fundamental technical advantages. Users might rely on capable results irrespective of title. The flexibility is outstanding.

Arc A380 from Intel isn't ignored entirely, but its gaming gap compared to Radeon RTX 4090 is challenging to dismiss. In budget-conscious builders, Arc A380 from Intel can still represent value provided the smaller asking price accounts for its lower performance. That said, when raw rendering capability, Radeon RTX 4090 represents the definite victor. This conclusion is clear. Performance seekers might shift toward Radeon RTX 4090.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A380
RTX 4090 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
9,728 +850.0%
Shaders
1,024
9,728 +850.0%
TMUs
64
304 +375.0%
ROPs
32
112 +250.0%
SM Count
76
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
16,384 +166.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
96 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
186.0 GB/s
576.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
189.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
515.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
32.98 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
515.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
32.98 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
76 +850.0%
Tensor Cores
304
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
75 W
120 W
TDP (W)
75
120 +60.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD103
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
45,900 million
Die Size
157 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
222 mm 8.7 inches
Height
114 mm 4.5 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
149 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
Battlemage
GeForce 50 Mobile
View Arc A380 Details View GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Details