GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2505 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
6,567
geekbench_opencl
20,255
216,160
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
260,450
passmark_directx_10
N/A
204
passmark_directx_11
N/A
314
passmark_directx_12
N/A
132
passmark_directx_9
N/A
370
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,239
passmark_g3d
N/A
34,457
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,671

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

If analyzing the NVIDIA RTX 4080 versus AMD Radeon 760M, the performance difference gets clearly visible. the NVIDIA RTX 4080 holds the top spot in nearly each benchmark we performed. The delta is considerable enough to influence actual rendering experiences. Enthusiasts can experience enhanced visuals. This conclusion is evident.

Gaming results over various scenarios reliably favor the NVIDIA RTX 4080. Whether it's multiplayer titles to AAA productions, the NVIDIA RTX 4080 maintains its advantage. This benchmark consistency across diverse scenarios proves core engineering improvements. Players should expect excellent experiences irrespective of title. This versatility is outstanding.

AMD Radeon 760M faces challenges to match the NVIDIA RTX 4080's absolute throughput. In price-conscious builders, AMD Radeon 760M might yet represent acceptable performance, though people demanding premium experience would invest toward the NVIDIA RTX 4080. The performance delta is sufficiently large to ignore. Heavy games particularly highlight this difference. This investment pays benefits in visual quality.

In conclusion, the NVIDIA RTX 4080 represents the more capable pick in this evaluation. The frame rate leads warrant attention for users building a powerful visual system. Though AMD Radeon 760M offers its strengths, the benchmark figures undeniably supports the NVIDIA RTX 4080. Form your selection with this in mind. The benchmark gap is considerable enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
RTX 4080
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
9,728 +1800.0%
Shaders
512
9,728 +1800.0%
TMUs
32
304 +850.0%
ROPs
16
112 +600.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
76
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
2205 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
2505 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1400 MHz 22.4 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
716.8 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
64 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
280.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
761.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS (2:1)
48.74 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
76 +850.0%
Tensor Cores
304
Power
TDP
15 W
320 W
TDP (W)
15
320 +2033.3%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Phoenix
AD103
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
GeForce 40
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
45,900 million
Die Size
178 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
142.6M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,199 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce RTX 4080 Details