GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 610M

CORE STATE Mendocino

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 1900 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080

CORE STATE AD103

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2505 MHz

TDP 320 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

4,535

214,739

geekbench_vulkan

6,353

263,779

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

6,567

passmark_directx_10

N/A

204

passmark_directx_11

N/A

314

passmark_directx_12

N/A

132

passmark_directx_9

N/A

370

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,239

passmark_g3d

N/A

34,457

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

20,671

Analysis: AMD Radeon 610M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Throughout this graphics card showdown, NVIDIA RTX 4080 establishes its superiority obviously. If you're gaming at 4K, NVIDIA RTX 4080 consistently outperforms AMD's AMD Radeon 610M by significant margins. This performance gap grows particularly wider at elevated resolutions. This card executes demanding titles with efficiency. The design superiority are apparent.

When it comes to ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX 4080 moves even more ahead of AMD's AMD Radeon 610M. The specialized cores handle demanding shadow rendering more smoothly. Enthusiasts wanting premium effects might strongly choose NVIDIA RTX 4080. The hardware RT advantage is considerable. Contemporary titles continually take advantage of hardware RT capabilities.

All things considered, NVIDIA RTX 4080 represents the better selection in this evaluation. The benchmark leads support consideration for users putting together a powerful graphics build. While AMD's AMD Radeon 610M possesses its advantages, the score results obviously favors NVIDIA RTX 4080. Form your selection considering this. This gaming delta is significant sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

610M

RTX 4080

Core Specs

Shading Units

128

9,728 +7500.0%

Shaders

128

9,728 +7500.0%

TMUs

304 +3700.0%

ROPs

112 +2700.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1500 MHz

2205 MHz

Boost Clock

1900 MHz

2505 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1400 MHz 22.4 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

16 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

16,384

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

System Shared

256 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

716.8 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

64 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

7.600 GPixel/s

280.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

15.20 GTexel/s

761.5 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

486.4 GFLOPS

48.74 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

30.40 GFLOPS (1:16)

761.5 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

972.8 GFLOPS (2:1)

48.74 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

76 +3700.0%

Tensor Cores

—

304

Power

TDP

15 W

320 W

TDP (W)

320 +2033.3%

Suggested PSU

—

700 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 16-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

Mendocino

AD103

Generation

Navi II IGP (Mendocino Mobile)

GeForce 40

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

—

45,900 million

Die Size

100 mm²

379 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

—

121.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.0

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Triple-slot

Length

—

310 mm 12.2 inches

Height

—

140 mm 5.5 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,199 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Vega II IGP

GeForce 30

Successor

Navi III IGP

GeForce 50

View Radeon 610M Details View GeForce RTX 4080 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 610M

GeForce RTX 4080

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 610M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons