GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

CORE STATE AD103

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2550 MHz

TDP 320 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

24,546

219,065

geekbench_vulkan

24,747

260,075

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

6,600

passmark_directx_10

N/A

193

passmark_directx_11

N/A

301

passmark_directx_12

N/A

134

passmark_directx_9

N/A

381

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,270

passmark_g3d

N/A

34,245

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

19,822

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Analyzing the test data for Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER and Intel's Arc A350M, an obvious trend appears. Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER consistently achieves superior FPS in the analysis. The speed lead spans from significant to exceptional relative to the particular scenario. Such dependability testifies to underlying design improvements. Consumers seeking rendering capability should pay attention.

When it comes to ray tracing, Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER leaps considerably beyond of Intel's Arc A350M. Its dedicated accelerators handle heavy global illumination computations considerably more smoothly. Users seeking cutting-edge effects should seriously favor Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER. The RT superiority is notable. Modern AAA games increasingly utilize RT capabilities.

Intel's Arc A350M has difficulty to rival Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER's absolute capability. For cost-sensitive builders, Intel's Arc A350M can nonetheless provide adequate capability, but those demanding the best results would invest toward Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER. The gaming margin is notably large to ignore. Intensive titles notably showcase this margin. This premium provides dividends in capability.

At the end of the day: Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER wins this battle convincingly. Those valuing rendering throughput might definitely favor Radeon RTX 4080 SUPER over Intel's Arc A350M. This test results confirms this assessment. Your scenarios will perform considerably more fluidly. It's a obvious champion in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A350M

RTX 4080 SUPER

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

10,240 +1233.3%

Shaders

768

10,240 +1233.3%

TMUs

320 +566.7%

ROPs

112 +366.7%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1150 MHz

2295 MHz

Boost Clock

2200 MHz

2550 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

1438 MHz 23 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

16 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

16,384 +300.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

64 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

736.3 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

64 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

52.80 GPixel/s

285.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

105.6 GTexel/s

816.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.379 TFLOPS

52.22 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)

816.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

52.22 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

80 +1233.3%

Tensor Cores

—

320

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

25 W

320 W

TDP (W)

320 +1180.0%

Suggested PSU

—

700 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

DG2-128

AD103

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

GeForce 40

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

45,900 million

Die Size

157 mm²

379 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

45.9M / mm²

121.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.6

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Triple-slot

Length

—

310 mm 12.2 inches

Height

—

140 mm 5.5 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

999 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

GeForce 30

Successor

—

GeForce 50

View Arc A350M Details View GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Details