GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 750

CORE STATE Rocket Lake

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 14 nm+++

LAUNCH DATE 2021

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3090

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz

TDP 350 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

6,743

172,758

geekbench_vulkan

8,138

53,927

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

5,118

passmark_directx_10

N/A

182

passmark_directx_11

N/A

220

passmark_directx_12

N/A

110

passmark_directx_9

N/A

268

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,063

passmark_g3d

N/A

26,645

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

15,356

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

During this graphics card battle, GeForce RTX 3090 establishes its dominance convincingly. Whether you're gaming at high resolutions, GeForce RTX 3090 dependably surpasses Intel UHD Graphics 750 by significant amounts. The frame rate delta increases notably greater at increased settings. This GPU handles heavy titles with capability. Its design benefits are clear.

Intel UHD Graphics 750 struggles to match GeForce RTX 3090's sheer capability. In price-conscious buyers, Intel UHD Graphics 750 can still offer sufficient frame rates, however people demanding premium quality would lean toward GeForce RTX 3090. The performance difference is too notable to deny. Intensive games especially highlight this disparity. The cost difference pays benefits in frame rates.

To summarize, GeForce RTX 3090 offers the stronger choice in this analysis. The gaming advantages support consideration for anyone constructing a powerful graphics system. While Intel UHD Graphics 750 possesses its advantages, the test results obviously advantages GeForce RTX 3090. Base your choice based on this. This performance margin is significant enough to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

UHD Graphics 750

RTX 3090

Core Specs

Shading Units

256

10,496 +4000.0%

Shaders

256

10,496 +4000.0%

TMUs

328 +1950.0%

ROPs

112 +1300.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

300 MHz

1395 MHz

Boost Clock

1300 MHz

1695 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1219 MHz 19.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

24,576

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

System Shared

384 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

936.2 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

—

6 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

10.40 GPixel/s

189.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

20.80 GTexel/s

556.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

665.6 GFLOPS

35.58 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

—

556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1)

35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Tensor Cores

—

328

Power

TDP

15 W

350 W

TDP (W)

350 +2233.3%

Suggested PSU

—

750 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 12-pin

Architecture

Generation 12.1

Ampere

GPU Name

Rocket Lake

GA102

Generation

HD Graphics (Rocket Lake)

GeForce 30

Process Size

14 nm+++

8 nm

Transistors

—

28,300 million

Die Size

—

628 mm²

Foundry

Intel

Samsung

Density

—

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 (12_1)

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Triple-slot

Length

—

336 mm 13.2 inches

Height

—

140 mm 5.5 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

Ring Bus

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,499 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

GeForce 20

Successor

—

GeForce 40

View UHD Graphics 750 Details View GeForce RTX 3090 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel UHD Graphics 750

GeForce RTX 3090

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons