GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3090

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz

TDP 350 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

5,118

geekbench_opencl

20,255

172,758

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

53,927

passmark_directx_10

182

passmark_directx_11

220

passmark_directx_12

110

passmark_directx_9

268

passmark_g2d

890

1,063

passmark_g3d

5,310

26,645

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

15,356

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Examining the test results for the NVIDIA RTX 3090 and AMD Radeon 760M (AMD), a clear story unfolds. the NVIDIA RTX 3090 steadily provides higher frame rates in this testing. This rendering advantage ranges from noticeable to outstanding based on the given title. Such steadiness speaks to inherent technical benefits. Buyers valuing graphics throughput would factor this in.

AMD Radeon 760M (AMD) faces challenges to rival the NVIDIA RTX 3090's raw capability. For budget builders, AMD Radeon 760M (AMD) may nonetheless offer acceptable capability, yet those wanting premium results will gravitate toward the NVIDIA RTX 3090. This gaming margin is too large to dismiss. Demanding scenarios especially showcase this margin. The premium pays returns in capability.

All things considered, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 offers the more capable option in this analysis. Its benchmark leads support evaluation for anyone constructing a high-performance visual PC. Even though AMD Radeon 760M (AMD) possesses its strengths, this benchmark figures obviously favors the NVIDIA RTX 3090. Make your selection based on this. This frame rate gap is considerable enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

RTX 3090

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

10,496 +1950.0%

Shaders

512

10,496 +1950.0%

TMUs

328 +925.0%

ROPs

112 +600.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

1395 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

1695 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1219 MHz 19.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

24,576

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

System Shared

384 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

936.2 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

6 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

189.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

556.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

35.58 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

82 +925.0%

Tensor Cores

—

328

Power

TDP

15 W

350 W

TDP (W)

350 +2233.3%

Suggested PSU

—

750 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 12-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Phoenix

GA102

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

GeForce 30

Process Size

4 nm

8 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

28,300 million

Die Size

178 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

142.6M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Triple-slot

Length

—

336 mm 13.2 inches

Height

—

140 mm 5.5 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,499 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 20

Successor

—

GeForce 40

View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce RTX 3090 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

GeForce RTX 3090

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons