GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3090

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz

TDP 350 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

378

5,118

geekbench_opencl

23,468

173,788

geekbench_vulkan

23,723

53,927

passmark_directx_10

N/A

182

passmark_directx_11

N/A

220

passmark_directx_12

N/A

110

passmark_directx_9

N/A

268

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,063

passmark_g3d

N/A

26,645

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

15,356

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Looking at the test data for RTX 3090 by NVIDIA and Radeon AMD Radeon 680M, a definite pattern emerges. RTX 3090 by NVIDIA steadily delivers superior frame rates in every benchmarking. This rendering edge varies from considerable to outstanding according to the individual title. Such reliability speaks to fundamental design advantages. Those wanting rendering capability might take note.

To summarize, RTX 3090 by NVIDIA offers the stronger choice in this comparison. Its frame rate superiority warrant consideration for buyers assembling a powerful graphics PC. Although Radeon AMD Radeon 680M features its merits, this benchmark figures undeniably favors RTX 3090 by NVIDIA. Form your selection accordingly. This frame rate delta is considerable enough to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

680M

RTX 3090

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

10,496 +1266.7%

Shaders

768

10,496 +1266.7%

TMUs

328 +583.3%

ROPs

112 +250.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2000 MHz

1395 MHz

Boost Clock

2200 MHz

1695 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1219 MHz 19.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

24,576

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

System Shared

384 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

936.2 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

6 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

70.40 GPixel/s

189.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

105.6 GTexel/s

556.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.379 TFLOPS

35.58 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

82 +583.3%

Tensor Cores

—

328

Power

TDP

50 W

350 W

TDP (W)

350 +600.0%

Suggested PSU

—

750 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 12-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Rembrandt+

GA102

Generation

Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)

GeForce 30

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

13,100 million

28,300 million

Die Size

208 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

63.0M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.0

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Triple-slot

Length

—

336 mm 13.2 inches

Height

—

140 mm 5.5 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,499 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Vega II IGP

GeForce 20

Successor

Navi III IGP

GeForce 40

View Radeon 680M Details View GeForce RTX 3090 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 680M

GeForce RTX 3090

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons