GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3080

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 10 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz

TDP 320 W

BUS WIDTH 320 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

4,407

geekbench_opencl

20,255

152,423

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

33,620

passmark_directx_10

170

passmark_directx_11

207

passmark_directx_12

100

passmark_directx_9

258

passmark_g2d

890

1,054

passmark_g3d

5,310

25,086

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

14,397

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Gaming performance comparisons between RTX 3080 from NVIDIA and Radeon AMD Radeon 760M indicate a definite champion. RTX 3080 from NVIDIA achieves considerably higher performance throughout current games. The graphics memory edge and technical improvements translate into noticeably smoother gaming quality. Performance data confirms this conclusion. Users looking for maximum visuals might factor this in.

In conclusion, RTX 3080 from NVIDIA provides the better choice in this analysis. The performance edges justify evaluation for anyone assembling a powerful graphics rig. Even though Radeon AMD Radeon 760M has its merits, the score data definitely benefits RTX 3080 from NVIDIA. Make your selection considering this. The performance difference is substantial sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

RTX 3080

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

8,704 +1600.0%

Shaders

512

8,704 +1600.0%

TMUs

272 +750.0%

ROPs

96 +500.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

1440 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

1710 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

10 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

10,240

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

System Shared

320 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

760.3 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

5 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

164.2 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

465.1 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

29.77 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

465.1 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

29.77 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

68 +750.0%

Tensor Cores

—

272

Power

TDP

15 W

320 W

TDP (W)

320 +2033.3%

Suggested PSU

—

700 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 12-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Phoenix

GA102

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

GeForce 30

Process Size

4 nm

8 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

28,300 million

Die Size

178 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

142.6M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

285 mm 11.2 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

699 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 20

Successor

—

GeForce 40

View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce RTX 3080 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

GeForce RTX 3080

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons