GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 750

CORE STATE Rocket Lake

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 14 nm+++

LAUNCH DATE 2021

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3070

CORE STATE GA104

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1725 MHz

TDP 220 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

6,743

112,821

geekbench_vulkan

8,138

21,022

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

3,162

passmark_directx_10

N/A

150

passmark_directx_11

N/A

182

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

247

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,001

passmark_g3d

N/A

22,214

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

11,195

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

If analyzing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 with Intel UHD Graphics 750, a benchmark difference grows quickly evident. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 holds the top spot in nearly all game we performed. This margin is considerable enough to influence actual rendering experiences. Users can notice better frame rates. This determination is obvious.

Intel UHD Graphics 750 encounters issues to match NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070's sheer capability. For cost-sensitive consumers, Intel UHD Graphics 750 may still deliver sufficient results, but people seeking top-tier performance should gravitate toward NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The frame rate gap is notably substantial to dismiss. Intensive titles especially reveal this margin. This premium delivers benefits in visual quality.

For users considering a acquisition choice, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 emerges as the advised pick. Its reliable frame rate advantage over Intel UHD Graphics 750 makes it the better investment for gaming-focused consumers. Consider your specific workloads, but this results guides toward NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. Form an wise selection. The frame rate delta is significant and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

UHD Graphics 750

RTX 3070

Core Specs

Shading Units

256

5,888 +2200.0%

Shaders

256

5,888 +2200.0%

TMUs

184 +1050.0%

ROPs

96 +1100.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

300 MHz

1500 MHz

Boost Clock

1300 MHz

1725 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

8,192

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6

Memory Bus

System Shared

256 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

448.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

—

4 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

10.40 GPixel/s

165.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

20.80 GTexel/s

317.4 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

665.6 GFLOPS

20.31 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

—

317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1)

20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Tensor Cores

—

184

Power

TDP

15 W

220 W

TDP (W)

220 +1366.7%

Suggested PSU

—

550 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 12-pin

Architecture

Generation 12.1

Ampere

GPU Name

Rocket Lake

GA104

Generation

HD Graphics (Rocket Lake)

GeForce 30

Process Size

14 nm+++

8 nm

Transistors

—

17,400 million

Die Size

—

392 mm²

Foundry

Intel

Samsung

Density

—

44.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 (12_1)

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

242 mm 9.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

Ring Bus

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

499 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

GeForce 20

Successor

—

GeForce 40

View UHD Graphics 750 Details View GeForce RTX 3070 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel UHD Graphics 750

GeForce RTX 3070

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons