GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3070

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1725 MHz
TDP 220 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
3,162
geekbench_opencl
20,255
112,821
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
21,022
passmark_directx_10
19
150
passmark_directx_11
52
182
passmark_directx_12
25
85
passmark_directx_9
65
247
passmark_g2d
890
1,001
passmark_g3d
5,310
22,214
passmark_gpu_compute
2,840
11,195

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

If analyzing RTX 3070 by NVIDIA versus AMD's AMD Radeon 760M, a performance gap becomes obviously visible. RTX 3070 by NVIDIA claims the top spot in almost all benchmark we performed. The difference is notable enough to change actual rendering performance. Users should notice improved visuals. The determination is straightforward.

Gaming results in different scenarios steadily benefit RTX 3070 by NVIDIA. From esports scenarios to heavy productions, RTX 3070 by NVIDIA preserves its advantage. The performance steadiness across diverse games demonstrates fundamental design improvements. Users should expect capable frame rates irrespective of scenario. The capability is notable.

AMD's AMD Radeon 760M shouldn't be overlooked completely, however the performance deficit relative to RTX 3070 by NVIDIA is challenging to deny. For budget-conscious consumers, AMD's AMD Radeon 760M might yet represent value when the reduced cost compensates for its lesser power. Nevertheless, when pure rendering capability, RTX 3070 by NVIDIA represents the obvious winner. This verdict is clear. Speed hunters might shift toward RTX 3070 by NVIDIA.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
RTX 3070
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
5,888 +1050.0%
Shaders
512
5,888 +1050.0%
TMUs
32
184 +475.0%
ROPs
16
96 +500.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
46
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
1725 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
165.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
317.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
20.31 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)
20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
46 +475.0%
Tensor Cores
184
Power
TDP
15 W
220 W
TDP (W)
15
220 +1366.7%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 12-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Phoenix
GA104
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
GeForce 30
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
17,400 million
Die Size
178 mm²
392 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
142.6M / mm²
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
242 mm 9.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
499 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 20
Successor
GeForce 40
View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce RTX 3070 Details