GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

CORE STATE Navi 10
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1350 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc Pro A30M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
60,126
N/A
geekbench_opencl
52,787
31,894
geekbench_vulkan
51,289
N/A
passmark_directx_10
71
N/A
passmark_directx_11
78
N/A
passmark_directx_12
48
N/A
passmark_directx_9
143
N/A
passmark_g2d
805
N/A
passmark_g3d
11,583
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
4,961
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

Visual performance benchmarks between the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and Intel Arc Pro A30M from Intel demonstrate a decisive champion. the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 provides significantly better frame rates throughout current AAA releases. This graphics memory advantage and architectural enhancements convert into noticeably smoother visual experiences. Score figures demonstrates this assessment. Enthusiasts demanding premium graphics should take note.

The video memory superiority of the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 gets progressively relevant at elevated resolutions. Ultra HD scenarios requires notable VRAM, and the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 has extra capacity. The translates into enhanced gameplay in heavy games. Upcoming software should progressively require more video memory. The edge increases over generations.

The memory benefit of the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 turns increasingly important at elevated settings. Demanding gaming demands significant graphics memory, and the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 has additional capacity. The leads into better frame rates in VRAM-hungry titles. Modern software will increasingly require additional VRAM. This superiority increases over generations.

Intel Arc Pro A30M from Intel is not dismissed fully, yet its gaming gap versus the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is hard to deny. In cost-sensitive builders, Intel Arc Pro A30M from Intel may yet be an option when the smaller cost adjusts for its lower frame rates. But, when raw rendering capability, the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700 remains the clear champion. The conclusion is clear. Capability chasers might lean toward the AMD AMD Radeon Pro 5700.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro 5700
Pro A30M
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
1,024 -55.6%
Shaders
2,304
1,024 -55.6%
TMUs
144
64 -55.6%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
36
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
384.0 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.221 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
1,024.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.192 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
130 W
50 W
TDP (W)
130
50 -61.5%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 10
DG2-128
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series)
Alchemist (Pro-Series Mobile)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
10,300 million
7,200 million
Die Size
251 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
41.0M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Outputs
No outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
View Radeon Pro 5700 Details View Arc Pro A30M Details