GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

CORE STATE AD103

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz

TDP 120 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

2,612

N/A

geekbench_opencl

98,554

180,831

geekbench_vulkan

85,631

170,774

passmark_directx_10

173

passmark_directx_11

262

passmark_directx_12

107

passmark_directx_9

181

310

passmark_g2d

732

984

passmark_g3d

12,534

27,212

passmark_gpu_compute

5,368

12,347

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

During this graphics card comparison, NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU establishes its leadership decisively. Whether you're gaming at 4K, NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU consistently exceeds the Intel Arc A750 by considerable amounts. This benchmark gap increases especially larger at higher resolutions. This GPU processes resource-hungry games with ease. The architectural benefits are obvious.

The VRAM advantage of NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU turns progressively critical at higher resolutions. High resolution scenarios consumes significant VRAM, and NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU provides extra buffer. This converts into improved experiences in VRAM-hungry scenarios. Modern releases can continually demand additional graphics memory. This superiority widens over generations.

Overall, NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU delivers the superior option in this analysis. The benchmark advantages justify examination for anyone constructing a capable gaming rig. Even though the Intel Arc A750 features its positives, the test figures definitely benefits NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU. Form your choice considering this. The gaming delta is considerable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A750

RTX 4090 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

3,584

9,728 +171.4%

Shaders

3,584

9,728 +171.4%

TMUs

224

304 +35.7%

ROPs

112

112 0.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

448

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2050 MHz

1335 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

1695 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

16 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

16,384 +100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

256 bit

Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s

576.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

16 MB

64 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

268.8 GPixel/s

189.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

537.6 GTexel/s

515.3 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

17.20 TFLOPS

32.98 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

515.3 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

32.98 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

76 +171.4%

Tensor Cores

—

304

XMX Cores

448

—

Power

TDP

225 W

120 W

TDP (W)

225

120 -46.7%

Suggested PSU

550 W

—

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

DG2-512

AD103

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 7)

GeForce 40 Mobile

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

21,700 million

45,900 million

Die Size

406 mm²

379 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

53.4M / mm²

121.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

IGP

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

289 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

GeForce 30 Mobile

Successor

Battlemage

GeForce 50 Mobile

View Arc A750 Details View GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Details