GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6600M

CORE STATE Navi 23
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2416 MHz
TDP 100 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A580

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 175 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,495
2,229
geekbench_metal
92,237
N/A
geekbench_opencl
67,765
91,657
geekbench_vulkan
73,740
79,381
passmark_directx_10
87
N/A
passmark_directx_11
136
N/A
passmark_directx_12
52
N/A
passmark_directx_9
184
N/A
passmark_g2d
728
N/A
passmark_g3d
13,929
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,646
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs Intel Arc A580

Reviewing the test figures for the RX 6600 card from AMD and Arc A580 from Intel, the picture of matched capability unfolds. None of the option dominates steadily over most games. This swapping of leads means core equality. Buyers have a genuine decision with these options. Each options deliver solid gaming results.

Based on a hardware standpoint, the RX 6600 card from AMD and Arc A580 from Intel share equivalent capabilities. Graphics memory configuration, CUDA/stream units, and bandwidth bandwidth are tightly comparable. The spec equivalence explains the comparable benchmark numbers. No has a notable engineering advantage. The comparison is level.

When benchmark scores is this matched, price and functionality turn the primary elements. Evaluate real-time ray tracing performance, AI upscaling technology, power consumption, and ecosystem support when selecting between the RX 6600 card from AMD and Arc A580 from Intel. All these considerations could tip the decision. Think comprehensively. The complete perspective plays a role.

Finally, builders can pick based on specific requirements instead of absolute performance alone. Both the RX 6600 card from AMD and Arc A580 from Intel deliver capable graphics capability for the given segments. This selection rests on individual priorities. Either pick is solid. Users couldn't go wrong between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6600M
A580
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
3,072 +71.4%
Shaders
1,792
3,072 +71.4%
TMUs
112
192 +71.4%
ROPs
64
96 +50.0%
Compute Units
28
Execution Units
384
Clocks
Base Clock
2068 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
2416 MHz
2000 MHz
Game Clock
2177 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
8,192 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
154.6 GPixel/s
192.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
270.6 GTexel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.659 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
541.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
1.536 TFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
17.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
24.58 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
24 -14.3%
XMX Cores
384
Power
TDP
100 W
175 W
TDP (W)
100
175 +75.0%
Suggested PSU
450 W
Power Connectors
None
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 23
DG2-512
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)
Alchemist (Arc 5)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
11,060 million
21,700 million
Die Size
237 mm²
406 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
46.7M / mm²
53.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Xe Graphics
Successor
Battlemage
View Radeon RX 6600M Details View Arc A580 Details