GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7500

CORE STATE Navi 33

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1700 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz

TDP 35 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

58,213

29,676

geekbench_vulkan

68,634

28,673

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

125

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

200

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,174

N/A

passmark_g3d

13,368

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,910

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc A370M

If analyzing the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 to GeForce Arc A370M, the performance gap becomes obviously evident. the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 claims the lead in nearly each test we executed. This margin is considerable sufficiently to affect everyday graphics experiences. Players can feel smoother frame rates. This determination is clear.

For RT, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 pulls significantly forward of GeForce Arc A370M. Its RT units execute complex lighting rendering significantly more smoothly. Players wanting modern graphics might definitely consider the AMD Radeon PRO W7500. The RT advantage is notable. Modern AAA games progressively take advantage of real-time ray tracing technology.

The video memory edge of the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 turns increasingly significant at demanding quality levels. High resolution workloads requires substantial VRAM, and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has more buffer. This leads into enhanced experiences in memory-intensive workloads. Modern games can continually need additional memory. This edge grows over the years.

In conclusion, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 provides the better option in this analysis. The frame rate superiority support attention for those assembling a high-performance gaming rig. Although GeForce Arc A370M offers its positives, the benchmark results clearly advantages the AMD Radeon PRO W7500. Base your choice with this in mind. This benchmark delta is notable sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7500

A370M

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

1,024 -42.9%

Shaders

1,792

1,024 -42.9%

TMUs

112

64 -42.9%

ROPs

32 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

128

Clocks

Base Clock

1500 MHz

1550 MHz

Boost Clock

1700 MHz

2050 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

112.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

4 MB

L3 Cache

32 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

108.8 GPixel/s

65.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

190.4 GTexel/s

131.2 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

12.19 TFLOPS

4.198 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

380.8 GFLOPS (1:32)

1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

24.37 TFLOPS (2:1)

8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

8 -71.4%

XMX Cores

—

128

Matrix Cores

—

Power

TDP

70 W

35 W

TDP (W)

35 -50.0%

Suggested PSU

250 W

—

Power Connectors

None

—

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 33

DG2-128

Codename

Hotpink Bonefish

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

Process Size

6 nm

Transistors

13,300 million

7,200 million

Die Size

204 mm²

157 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

65.2M / mm²

45.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

IGP

Length

216 mm 8.5 inches

—

Height

115 mm 4.5 inches

—

Outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

429 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

—

View Radeon PRO W7500 Details View Arc A370M Details