GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2090 MHz
TDP 180 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
4,201
N/A
geekbench_opencl
129,499
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
158,760
22,237

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

Rendering performance evaluations between RX 7900 (AMD) and NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics indicate a clear champion. RX 7900 (AMD) offers notably superior benchmark scores in recent titles. This memory superiority and technical enhancements lead into obviously smoother rendering quality. Score data demonstrates this finding. Users wanting premium visuals might factor this in.

Playing games benchmarks in diverse games repeatedly benefit RX 7900 (AMD). Whether it's multiplayer games to heavy titles, RX 7900 (AMD) keeps its superiority. This benchmark consistency in multiple games demonstrates underlying technical benefits. Gamers can rely on solid experiences irrespective of genre. This adaptability is remarkable.

Playing games tests throughout different games consistently favor RX 7900 (AMD). Whether it's fast-paced scenarios to AAA games, RX 7900 (AMD) keeps its edge. The benchmark dependability across diverse workloads proves inherent technical superiority. Users can rely on solid frame rates independent of game type. The adaptability is outstanding.

Overall, RX 7900 (AMD) provides the superior pick in this evaluation. The performance leads support consideration for anyone building a high-performance graphics rig. While NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics possesses its advantages, this performance figures undeniably benefits RX 7900 (AMD). Make your choice accordingly. This frame rate margin is substantial enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7900M
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
768 -83.3%
Shaders
4,608
768 -83.3%
TMUs
288
24 -91.7%
ROPs
192
16 -91.7%
Compute Units
72
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
38.52 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,203.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
77.05 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
6 -91.7%
Tensor Cores
24
Power
TDP
180 W
50 W
TDP (W)
180
50 -72.2%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 31
GA107
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
529 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
109.1M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon RX 7900M Details View RTX A400 Details