GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2090 MHz
TDP 180 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 50HX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1545 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
4,201
N/A
geekbench_opencl
129,499
56,135
geekbench_vulkan
158,760
47,445

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

Analyzing the test numbers for the AMD RX 7900 and NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics, an obvious pattern emerges. the AMD RX 7900 steadily delivers superior FPS in every benchmarking. This benchmark superiority spans from considerable to outstanding relative to the given scenario. This reliability testifies to core engineering improvements. Users wanting visual capability should take note.

This memory advantage of the AMD RX 7900 becomes increasingly critical at increased resolutions. High resolution gaming requires notable VRAM, and the AMD RX 7900 has extra buffer. The results into enhanced frame rates in VRAM-hungry scenarios. Upcoming software might continually demand extra graphics memory. This superiority increases over releases.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics encounters issues to compete with the AMD RX 7900's absolute performance. In cost-sensitive builders, NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics might yet offer acceptable frame rates, but people wanting maximum performance will look toward the AMD RX 7900. The frame rate difference is too large to dismiss. Heavy games specifically highlight this difference. This price gap returns returns in visual quality.

In conclusion, the AMD RX 7900 provides the superior choice in this evaluation. The performance advantages warrant attention for anyone putting together a capable rendering rig. Even though NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics has its strengths, the benchmark numbers clearly favors the AMD RX 7900. Form your decision accordingly. The performance margin is significant sufficiently to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7900M
CMP 50HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
3,584 -22.2%
Shaders
4,608
3,584 -22.2%
TMUs
288
192 -33.3%
ROPs
192
80 -58.3%
Compute Units
72
SM Count
56
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1545 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
10 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
10,240 -37.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
560.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
5 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
123.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
38.52 TFLOPS
11.07 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,203.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
346.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
77.05 TFLOPS (2:1)
22.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
56 -22.2%
Tensor Cores
448
Power
TDP
180 W
250 W
TDP (W)
180
250 +38.9%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
None
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 31
TU102
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
18,600 million
Die Size
529 mm²
754 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
24.7M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
View Radeon RX 7900M Details View CMP 50HX Details