GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2090 MHz

TDP 180 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

4,201

2,612

geekbench_opencl

129,499

98,554

geekbench_vulkan

158,760

85,631

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

181

passmark_g2d

N/A

732

passmark_g3d

N/A

12,534

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs Intel Arc A750

Analyzing the test figures for AMD's RX 7900 graphics and Arc A750 by Intel, a clear pattern develops. AMD's RX 7900 graphics consistently delivers higher frame rates in this benchmarking. The benchmark superiority varies from substantial to exceptional according to the given game. This consistency points to underlying technical superiority. Users wanting graphics throughput will factor this in.

Game performance performance in diverse games repeatedly favor AMD's RX 7900 graphics. From competitive scenarios to demanding titles, AMD's RX 7900 graphics keeps its lead. This benchmark steadiness over diverse games demonstrates inherent engineering benefits. Enthusiasts can expect solid performance regardless of genre. The adaptability is notable.

To summarize, AMD's RX 7900 graphics offers the better choice in this matchup. The benchmark superiority warrant attention for buyers putting together a demanding visual rig. Although Arc A750 by Intel possesses its strengths, this score results definitely supports AMD's RX 7900 graphics. Form your decision based on this. This performance margin is significant sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 7900M

A750

Core Specs

Shading Units

4,608

3,584 -22.2%

Shaders

4,608

3,584 -22.2%

TMUs

288

224 -22.2%

ROPs

192

112 -41.7%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

448

Clocks

Base Clock

1825 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

2090 MHz

2400 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

8,192 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

256 bit

Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

512.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

6 MB

16 MB

L3 Cache

64 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

401.3 GPixel/s

268.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

601.9 GTexel/s

537.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

38.52 TFLOPS

17.20 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,203.8 GFLOPS (1:32)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

77.05 TFLOPS (2:1)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

28 -61.1%

XMX Cores

—

448

Power

TDP

180 W

225 W

TDP (W)

180

225 +25.0%

Suggested PSU

—

550 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 31

DG2-512

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Process Size

5 nm

6 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

21,700 million

Die Size

529 mm²

406 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

109.1M / mm²

53.4M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

289 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon RX 7900M Details View Arc A750 Details