GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

CORE STATE Navi 33

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2410 MHz

TDP 90 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

63,775

22,844

geekbench_vulkan

N/A

22,237

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

N/A

899

passmark_g3d

N/A

5,983

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

2,557

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

Visual performance benchmarks between the AMD RX 7600 and GeForce NVIDIA RTX A400 reveal a obvious victor. the AMD RX 7600 provides notably superior frame rates across modern titles. This VRAM superiority and design enhancements result into clearly enhanced visual quality. Performance numbers supports this conclusion. Enthusiasts demanding premium visuals should consider this.

The video memory superiority of the AMD RX 7600 becomes increasingly important at increased detail settings. High resolution scenarios needs considerable video memory, and the AMD RX 7600 delivers extra buffer. The results into smoother performance in heavy titles. Modern titles will only need additional memory. The edge grows over the years.

All things considered, the AMD RX 7600 delivers the more capable pick in this comparison. Its frame rate superiority validate attention for anyone assembling a powerful graphics build. Even though GeForce NVIDIA RTX A400 offers its strengths, this score figures clearly supports the AMD RX 7600. Make your decision with this in mind. The performance gap is considerable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 7600M

RTX A400

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

768 -57.1%

Shaders

1,792

768 -57.1%

TMUs

112

24 -78.6%

ROPs

16 -75.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1500 MHz

1417 MHz

Boost Clock

2410 MHz

1762 MHz

Game Clock

2070 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

96.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

L3 Cache

32 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

154.2 GPixel/s

28.19 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

269.9 GTexel/s

42.29 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

17.27 TFLOPS

2.706 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

539.8 GFLOPS (1:32)

42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

34.55 TFLOPS (2:1)

2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

6 -78.6%

Tensor Cores

—

Power

TDP

90 W

50 W

TDP (W)

50 -44.4%

Suggested PSU

—

250 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Navi 33

GA107

Codename

Hotpink Bonefish

—

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

13,300 million

8,700 million

Die Size

204 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

65.2M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Length

—

163 mm 6.4 inches

Height

—

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

Active

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Quadro Turing

Successor

—

Workstation Ada

View Radeon RX 7600M Details View RTX A400 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

RTX A400

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons