GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6700M

CORE STATE Navi 22

VRAM 10 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 135 W

BUS WIDTH 160 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

Intel

GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

1,845

N/A

geekbench_metal

91,911

N/A

geekbench_opencl

77,666

14,315

geekbench_vulkan

90,816

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

129

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

155

N/A

passmark_g2d

555

N/A

passmark_g3d

13,536

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,191

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Examining the test numbers for GeForce RX 6700 and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, a clear pattern emerges. GeForce RX 6700 consistently produces superior scores in this benchmarking. The performance edge varies from substantial to impressive relative to the individual scenario. Such steadiness points to core engineering improvements. Buyers wanting graphics performance will take note.

This VRAM edge of GeForce RX 6700 turns increasingly relevant at increased quality levels. High resolution scenarios requires considerable video memory, and GeForce RX 6700 delivers extra buffer. This translates into improved experiences in memory-intensive workloads. Modern software might increasingly consume greater memory. The superiority expands over releases.

All things considered, GeForce RX 6700 provides the more capable selection in this analysis. Its performance superiority justify evaluation for buyers putting together a capable visual PC. Even though Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers its positives, the score data clearly benefits GeForce RX 6700. Base your decision accordingly. The frame rate delta is considerable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6700M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Core Specs

Shading Units

2,304

768 -66.7%

Shaders

2,304

768 -66.7%

TMUs

144

48 -66.7%

ROPs

24 -62.5%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1489 MHz

300 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

1650 MHz

Game Clock

2300 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

10 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

10,240

4,096 -60.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

LPDDR4X

Memory Bus

160 bit

128 bit

Bandwidth

320.0 GB/s

68.26 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

3 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

80 MB

16 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

153.6 GPixel/s

39.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

345.6 GTexel/s

79.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

11.06 TFLOPS

2.534 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

691.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

22.12 TFLOPS (2:1)

5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

135 W

25 W

TDP (W)

135

25 -81.5%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

—

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Generation 12.1

GPU Name

Navi 22

DG1

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Xe Graphics

Process Size

7 nm

10 nm

Transistors

17,200 million

—

Die Size

335 mm²

95 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Density

51.3M / mm²

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Graphics

Successor

—

Alchemist

View Radeon RX 6700M Details View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 6700M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons