GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

CORE STATE Navi 24

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2840 MHz

TDP 80 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

42,536

98,554

geekbench_vulkan

50,867

85,631

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

2,612

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

181

passmark_g2d

N/A

732

passmark_g3d

N/A

12,534

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs Intel Arc A750

Rendering performance evaluations between Arc A750 (Intel) and AMD's RX 6550 demonstrate a obvious leader. Arc A750 (Intel) delivers substantially higher performance over modern titles. The graphics memory benefit and technical improvements lead into visibly better visual quality. Performance data supports this conclusion. Users demanding premium performance should consider this.

In-game results across various scenarios repeatedly benefit Arc A750 (Intel). From multiplayer scenarios to blockbuster titles, Arc A750 (Intel) maintains its lead. The gaming consistency throughout various workloads indicates core engineering improvements. Users will expect strong performance no matter of title. This flexibility is notable.

The VRAM superiority of Arc A750 (Intel) gets more important at higher resolutions. Demanding rendering needs substantial graphics memory, and Arc A750 (Intel) delivers additional headroom. The results into improved performance in VRAM-hungry games. Next-gen games will increasingly consume additional video memory. This superiority expands over releases.

Ultimately: Arc A750 (Intel) claims this showdown convincingly. Users prioritizing graphics throughput should certainly favor Arc A750 (Intel) over AMD's RX 6550. This score evidence supports this verdict. The games should render significantly faster. This is a definite victor in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6550M

A750

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

3,584 +250.0%

Shaders

1,024

3,584 +250.0%

TMUs

224 +250.0%

ROPs

112 +250.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

448

Clocks

Base Clock

2000 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

2840 MHz

2400 MHz

Game Clock

2560 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

8,192 +100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

144.0 GB/s

512.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

1024 KB

16 MB

L3 Cache

16 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

90.88 GPixel/s

268.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

181.8 GTexel/s

537.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.816 TFLOPS

17.20 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

363.5 GFLOPS (1:16)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

11.63 TFLOPS (2:1)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

28 +75.0%

XMX Cores

—

448

Power

TDP

80 W

225 W

TDP (W)

225 +181.3%

Suggested PSU

—

550 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 24

DG2-512

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Process Size

6 nm

Transistors

5,400 million

21,700 million

Die Size

107 mm²

406 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

50.5M / mm²

53.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x4

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

289 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon RX 6550M Details View Arc A750 Details