GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz
TDP 295 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A570M

CORE STATE DG2-256
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz
TDP 75 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
84,379
58,239
geekbench_vulkan
137,070
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc A570M

Analyzing the test data for Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and Intel Arc A570M, an obvious trend emerges. Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 consistently achieves stronger scores in the benchmarking. The rendering lead ranges from considerable to remarkable according to the given benchmark. This consistency speaks to core technical superiority. Consumers valuing graphics power would consider this.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 moves even more ahead of Intel Arc A570M. The specialized accelerators execute demanding shadow calculations more capably. Users demanding next-gen fidelity should seriously choose Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900. This real-time ray tracing capability is notable. Next-gen titles progressively utilize hardware RT effects.

Intel Arc A570M struggles to match Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900's raw performance. In budget buyers, Intel Arc A570M may nevertheless represent sufficient frame rates, yet users seeking maximum experience might invest toward Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900. This performance margin is too large to ignore. Resource-hungry workloads especially highlight this difference. The price gap provides returns in capability.

Ultimately: Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 claims this battle obviously. Consumers wanting visual performance should certainly favor Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W7900 over Intel Arc A570M. This performance data demonstrates this recommendation. The titles might perform substantially better. This is a clear choice in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7900
A570M
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,144
2,048 -66.7%
Shaders
6,144
2,048 -66.7%
TMUs
384
128 -66.7%
ROPs
192
64 -66.7%
Compute Units
96
Execution Units
256
Clocks
Base Clock
1760 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
48 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
49,152
8,192 -83.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
384 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
864.0 GB/s
224.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
L2 Cache
6 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
83.20 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
10.65 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
96
16 -83.3%
XMX Cores
256
Matrix Cores
192
Power
TDP
295 W
75 W
TDP (W)
295
75 -74.6%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 31
DG2-256
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile)
Process Size
5 nm
6 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
11,500 million
Die Size
529 mm²
269 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
42.8M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
IGP
Length
280 mm 11 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
3,999 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View Arc A570M Details