GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 48 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz

TDP 295 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

84,379

24,546

geekbench_vulkan

137,070

24,747

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc A350M

Graphics performance evaluations between AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and the Intel Arc A350M indicate a definite leader. AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7900 provides notably superior FPS across modern AAA releases. This video memory advantage and architectural advances convert into clearly better gameplay performance. Benchmark numbers supports this conclusion. Users looking for top-tier performance might factor this in.

the Intel Arc A350M shouldn't be ignored altogether, yet its benchmark shortfall relative to AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is challenging to overlook. For price-aware builders, the Intel Arc A350M can still be sense provided its lesser MSRP makes up for its lower capabilities. However, for peak rendering performance, AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the obvious victor. This assessment is obvious. Speed chasers might shift toward AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7900.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7900

A350M

Core Specs

Shading Units

6,144

768 -87.5%

Shaders

6,144

768 -87.5%

TMUs

384

48 -87.5%

ROPs

192

24 -87.5%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1760 MHz

1150 MHz

Boost Clock

2495 MHz

2200 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

48 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

49,152

4,096 -91.7%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

384 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

864.0 GB/s

112.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

6 MB

4 MB

L3 Cache

96 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

479.0 GPixel/s

52.80 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

958.1 GTexel/s

105.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

61.32 TFLOPS

3.379 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)

844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

61.32 TFLOPS (1:1)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

6 -93.8%

XMX Cores

—

Matrix Cores

192

—

Power

TDP

295 W

25 W

TDP (W)

295

25 -91.5%

Suggested PSU

600 W

—

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

—

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 31

DG2-128

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

Process Size

5 nm

6 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

7,200 million

Die Size

529 mm²

157 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

109.1M / mm²

45.9M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.9

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

IGP

Length

280 mm 11 inches

—

Height

110 mm 4.3 inches

—

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

3,999 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

—

View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View Arc A350M Details