GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W6400

CORE STATE Navi 24

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2321 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

35,027

22,844

geekbench_vulkan

39,286

22,237

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

N/A

899

passmark_g3d

N/A

5,983

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

2,557

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

Examining the test results for AMD AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400, an obvious trend unfolds. AMD AMD Radeon PRO W6400 steadily delivers superior FPS in our benchmarking. The benchmark lead extends from considerable to impressive relative to the particular benchmark. This reliability points to inherent technical improvements. Buyers prioritizing rendering throughput might consider this.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 has difficulty to compete with AMD AMD Radeon PRO W6400's sheer capability. In price-conscious buyers, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 can still offer reasonable frame rates, but users demanding the best experience should invest toward AMD AMD Radeon PRO W6400. The benchmark difference is too considerable to deny. Intensive games especially reveal this gap. The price gap pays returns in capability.

The bottom line: AMD AMD Radeon PRO W6400 takes this matchup decisively. Consumers seeking visual power should definitely consider AMD AMD Radeon PRO W6400 over NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400. This benchmark results supports this conclusion. Your titles will render considerably smoother. This is a straightforward champion in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W6400

RTX A400

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

768 0.0%

Shaders

768

768 0.0%

TMUs

24 -50.0%

ROPs

16 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2039 MHz

1417 MHz

Boost Clock

2321 MHz

1762 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

4,096 0.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

Bandwidth

128.0 GB/s

96.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

1024 KB

2 MB

L3 Cache

8 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

74.27 GPixel/s

28.19 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

111.4 GTexel/s

42.29 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.565 TFLOPS

2.706 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

222.8 GFLOPS (1:16)

42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

7.130 TFLOPS (2:1)

2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

6 -50.0%

Tensor Cores

—

Power

TDP

50 W

TDP (W)

50 0.0%

Suggested PSU

250 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Navi 24

GA107

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi II Series)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

5,400 million

8,700 million

Die Size

107 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

50.5M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

Length

—

163 mm 6.4 inches

Height

—

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x4

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Quadro Turing

Successor

—

Workstation Ada

View Radeon PRO W6400 Details View RTX A400 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W6400

RTX A400

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons