GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W6400

CORE STATE Navi 24

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2321 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

35,027

98,554

geekbench_vulkan

39,286

85,631

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

2,612

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

181

passmark_g2d

N/A

732

passmark_g3d

N/A

12,534

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs Intel Arc A750

Reviewing the test results for GeForce Arc A750 and Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W6400, a definite pattern appears. GeForce Arc A750 repeatedly produces higher frame rates in the evaluation. This benchmark superiority extends from considerable to impressive according to the particular benchmark. This reliability speaks to core architectural improvements. Buyers prioritizing gaming performance should pay attention.

Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W6400 has difficulty to keep up with GeForce Arc A750's absolute power. For budget builders, Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W6400 might nonetheless offer adequate results, but those needing the best results should lean toward GeForce Arc A750. The performance gap is significantly large to deny. Demanding workloads especially reveal this disparity. The price gap returns returns in capability.

The memory benefit of GeForce Arc A750 gets progressively important at demanding quality levels. Ultra HD workloads requires considerable VRAM, and GeForce Arc A750 offers extra capability. The converts into improved performance in heavy games. Modern titles can progressively require additional memory. This edge grows over time.

To summarize, GeForce Arc A750 provides the better choice in this matchup. The frame rate advantages support attention for buyers building a demanding rendering build. Even though Radeon AMD Radeon PRO W6400 offers its merits, the score data definitely supports GeForce Arc A750. Make your choice with this in mind. The benchmark difference is notable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W6400

A750

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

3,584 +366.7%

Shaders

768

3,584 +366.7%

TMUs

224 +366.7%

ROPs

112 +250.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

448

Clocks

Base Clock

2039 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

2321 MHz

2400 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

8,192 +100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

128.0 GB/s

512.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

1024 KB

16 MB

L3 Cache

8 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

74.27 GPixel/s

268.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

111.4 GTexel/s

537.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.565 TFLOPS

17.20 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

222.8 GFLOPS (1:16)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

7.130 TFLOPS (2:1)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

28 +133.3%

XMX Cores

—

448

Power

TDP

50 W

225 W

TDP (W)

225 +350.0%

Suggested PSU

250 W

550 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 24

DG2-512

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi II Series)

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Process Size

6 nm

Transistors

5,400 million

21,700 million

Die Size

107 mm²

406 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

50.5M / mm²

53.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

Dual-slot

Outputs

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x4

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

289 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon PRO W6400 Details View Arc A750 Details