CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 32 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 90W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Core i5-13600

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-S

CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

1,761

2,683

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

248

378

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

7,338

11,180

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,035

1,578

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

17,472

26,620

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,466

3,758

passmark_data_compression

232,242

383,972

passmark_data_encryption

15,809

22,182

passmark_extended_instructions

14,251

23,045

passmark_find_prime_numbers

109

passmark_floating_point_math

34,757

81,892

passmark_integer_math

62,128

111,044

passmark_multithread

20,556

31,725

passmark_physics

1,905

1,782

passmark_random_string_sorting

34,613

42,040

passmark_single_thread

2,371

4,049

passmark_singlethread

2,371

4,049

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Core i5-13600

Analyzing the score results for Intel I5-13600 processor and the AMD AMD EPYC 8024P, a definite picture unfolds. Intel I5-13600 processor steadily achieves higher numbers over multiple tests. This speed edge varies from considerable to outstanding depending on the individual workload. Such reliability testifies to inherent architectural advantages. Consumers wanting capability should consider this.

Looking at a hardware perspective, Intel I5-13600 processor includes superior cache, better turbo speeds, and additional advanced heat management. Such factors unite to offer reliably better performance across different scenarios. This technical improvements make Intel I5-13600 processor a strong selection. If you're rendering, this processor manages it effectively. Enthusiasts can especially benefit from these gains.

The bottom line: Intel I5-13600 processor secures this comparison decisively. Consumers prioritizing speed might seriously select Intel I5-13600 processor over the AMD AMD EPYC 8024P. The score results demonstrates this assessment. The scenarios should improve from its stronger power. This is a straightforward winner in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 8024P

i5-13600

Core Specs

Cores

14 +75.0%

Threads

20 +25.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.7 +12.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5 +66.7%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.7 +12.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5 +66.7%

Multiplier

27 +12.5%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

32 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

65 -27.8%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

154 W

Configurable TDP

70-100 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4c

Raptor Lake

Codename

Siena

Raptor Lake-S

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Core i5 (Raptor Lake)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

8,875 million

—

Die Size

73 mm²

215 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Six-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

230.4 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP6

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series

PCIe

Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8

E-Core Frequency

—

2000 MHz up to 3.7 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 770

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$409

$255

Part Number

100-000001136

SRMBS

Package

FC-LGA4844

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

None

View EPYC 8024P Details View Core i5-13600 Details