CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 260

CORE STATE Hawk Point

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 16 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 210H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 12 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

2,747.5

1,757

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

276.5

247

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

17,211.5

11,830

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

1,770.5

1,771

passmark_data_compression

351,517

217,805

passmark_data_encryption

20,267

12,187

passmark_extended_instructions

26,544

13,370

passmark_find_prime_numbers

passmark_floating_point_math

59,462

45,057

passmark_integer_math

96,737

61,503

passmark_multithread

28,078

18,252

passmark_physics

1,218

1,040

passmark_random_string_sorting

42,383

23,451

passmark_single_thread

3,736

3,539

passmark_singlethread

3,736

3,539

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

6,504

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

918

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core 5 210H

When comparing AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD vs Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor, the score disparity is immediately apparent. Boasting better concurrent capabilities, AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD achieves considerably faster processing in heavy tasks. This core count benefit translates obviously into everyday benefits. Performance data confirms this conclusion. Buyers wanting peak performance can benefit from what AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD delivers to the equation.

This performance delta between AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD and Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor becomes particularly obvious in multi-threaded workloads. Workloads like video editing highlight AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD's advantages. The greater execution units give notable throughput for intensive applications. This power leads into shorter render times. Productivity advantages are real and considerable.

For buyers facing a buying selection, AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD stands as the preferred selection. Its consistent processing superiority over Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor makes it the more logical investment for performance-oriented users. Evaluate your particular workloads, however this results points toward AMD Ryzen 7 260 by AMD. Make an wise choice. The performance difference is measurable and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

7 260

5 210H

Core Specs

Cores

8 0.0%

Threads

12 -25.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.8

2.2 -42.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5.1

4.8 -5.9%

Frequency (GHz)

3.8

2.2 -42.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5.1

4.8 -5.9%

Multiplier

22 -42.1%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

16 MB (shared)

12 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

45 0.0%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

35-54 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Raptor Lake

Codename

Hawk Point

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

25,000 million

—

Die Size

178 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket FP8

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz

AI/NPU

XDNA NPU

16 TOPS

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 780M

Iris Xe Graphics 48EU

Other

Market

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

—

$342

Part Number

100-000001724

SRQ6RQ5MN

Package

FP8, FP7, FP7r2

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

100°C

View Ryzen 7 260 Details View Core 5 210H Details