CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9745

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 3 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 9 270H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

11,198

2,464

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,580

347

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

46,659

10,268

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

6,586

1,449

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

111,093

18,000

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

15,683

2,040

passmark_data_compression

3,929,890

333,785

passmark_data_encryption

229,447

19,369

passmark_extended_instructions

280,477

20,079

passmark_find_prime_numbers

979

112

passmark_floating_point_math

761,219

70,640

passmark_integer_math

1,224,315

97,654

passmark_multithread

130,698

28,764

passmark_physics

17,122

1,966

passmark_random_string_sorting

468,975

36,867

passmark_single_thread

2,806

3,944

passmark_singlethread

2,806

3,944

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9745 vs Intel Core 9 270H

Analyzing the score figures for the AMD AMD EPYC 9745 and Intel Core 9 270H from Intel, an obvious trend develops. the AMD AMD EPYC 9745 steadily delivers higher performance throughout various tests. The benchmark edge varies from significant to outstanding based on the individual test. This steadiness testifies to fundamental design benefits. Consumers valuing power would consider this.

Game performance tests furthermore advantage the AMD AMD EPYC 9745 in this comparison. Improved frame rates and better reliable frame pacing result from the better single-core capability. Those who game will experience enhanced sessions, particularly in CPU-bound situations. This benefit holds over different settings. Fast-paced gaming notably benefits from this performance lead.

All things considered, the AMD AMD EPYC 9745 represents the superior option in this matchup. The speed superiority warrant examination for buyers constructing a high-performance build. While Intel Core 9 270H from Intel features its positives, this test numbers clearly favors the AMD AMD EPYC 9745. Base your decision based on this. This speed margin is significant enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9745

9 270H

Core Specs

Cores

128

14 -89.1%

Threads

256

20 -92.2%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.7 +12.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

5.8 +56.8%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.7 +12.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

5.8 +56.8%

Multiplier

27 +12.5%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

45 -88.8%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))

Core 9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

3 nm

10 nm

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8

E-Core Frequency

—

2000 MHz up to 4.1 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$12141

$697

Part Number

100-000001460

SRQ6V

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9745 Details View Core 9 270H Details