CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9354

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.25 Base / 3.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 280W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 210H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 12 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

6,221

1,757

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

878

247

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

25,923

6,504

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,659

918

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

61,722

11,830

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

8,713

1,771

passmark_data_compression

1,168,626

217,805

passmark_data_encryption

71,400

12,187

passmark_extended_instructions

86,176

13,370

passmark_find_prime_numbers

934

passmark_floating_point_math

188,894

45,057

passmark_integer_math

304,828

61,503

passmark_multithread

72,615

18,252

passmark_physics

9,281

1,040

passmark_random_string_sorting

140,690

23,451

passmark_single_thread

2,601

3,539

passmark_singlethread

2,601

3,539

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9354 vs Intel Core 5 210H

If you're comparing AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD versus Intel Core 5 210H by Intel, the difference is obviously noticeable. Featuring superior multi-core capabilities, AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD delivers noticeably more rapid results in demanding workloads. The thread configuration advantage results directly into everyday benefits. Score data confirms this assessment. Users seeking peak power will benefit from what AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD delivers to the table.

Considering a hardware perspective, AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD offers enhanced memory subsystem, faster turbo speeds, and greater efficient heat regulation. All these components work together to give dependably stronger results across diverse applications. This design advances position AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD a attractive pick. If you're compiling, the CPU executes it effectively. Enthusiasts can especially enjoy these improvements.

In conclusion, AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD delivers the more capable pick in this analysis. The processing advantages warrant consideration for users assembling a capable PC. Although Intel Core 5 210H by Intel has its merits, this performance data clearly supports AMD EPYC 9354 from AMD. Form your selection considering this. This processing gap is considerable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9354

5 210H

Core Specs

Cores

8 -75.0%

Threads

12 -81.3%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.25

2.2 -32.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.8

4.8 +26.3%

Frequency (GHz)

3.25

2.2 -32.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.8

4.8 +26.3%

Multiplier

32.5

22 -32.3%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

12 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

280

45 -83.9%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

240-300 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Raptor Lake

Codename

Genoa

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

52,560 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 48EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$3420

$342

Part Number

100-100000798

SRQ6RQ5MN

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9354 Details View Core 5 210H Details