CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9275F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.1 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 320W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 210H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
7,250
1,563
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,023
220
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
30,209
6,515
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
4,264
919
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
71,927
15,514
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
10,154
2,190
passmark_data_compression
1,212,560
217,805
passmark_data_encryption
62,664
12,187
passmark_extended_instructions
94,889
13,370
passmark_find_prime_numbers
991
53
passmark_floating_point_math
201,888
45,057
passmark_integer_math
317,777
61,503
passmark_multithread
84,620
18,252
passmark_physics
12,089
1,040
passmark_random_string_sorting
144,037
23,451
passmark_single_thread
3,810
3,539
passmark_singlethread
3,810
3,539

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9275F vs Intel Core 5 210H

If you're comparing the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F versus Intel Core 5 210H from Intel, the performance gap is clearly evident. Boasting better multi-threaded performance, the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F delivers significantly more rapid results in demanding workloads. This core count superiority converts immediately into actual advantages. Score figures supports this observation. People needing maximum speed will notice what the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F delivers to the comparison.

Looking at a engineering angle, the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F boasts improved L3, increased frequencies, and additional refined energy control. The factors combine to deliver dependably superior benchmarks throughout various workloads. This technical enhancements render the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F a solid choice. Whether you're rendering, the silicon executes it capably. Professionals might particularly benefit from these improvements.

Intel Core 5 210H from Intel shouldn't be dismissed completely, however the processing difference compared to the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F is challenging to deny. In cost-sensitive consumers, Intel Core 5 210H from Intel could nevertheless be sense assuming the lesser MSRP makes up for the reduced capabilities. However, for peak performance, the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F remains the obvious champion. This assessment is evident. Power enthusiasts would gravitate toward the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9275F
5 210H
Core Specs
Cores
24
8 -66.7%
Threads
48
12 -75.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.1
2.2 -46.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.8 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
4.1
2.2 -46.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.8 0.0%
Multiplier
41
22 -46.3%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
320
45 -85.9%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$3439
$342
Part Number
100-000001144
SRQ6RQ5MN
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9275F Details View Core 5 210H Details