CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9175F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 512 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 320W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6517P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 72 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 190W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
5,636
4,268
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
795
602
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
23,487
17,787
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
3,315
2,511
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
55,923
42,352
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
7,895
5,979
passmark_data_compression
867,186
653,338
passmark_data_encryption
42,297
32,385
passmark_extended_instructions
70,529
51,891
passmark_find_prime_numbers
741
335
passmark_floating_point_math
145,939
127,497
passmark_integer_math
219,800
162,671
passmark_multithread
67,634
49,786
passmark_physics
9,984
4,452
passmark_random_string_sorting
95,783
67,480
passmark_single_thread
4,256
3,311
passmark_singlethread
4,256
3,311

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9175F vs Intel Xeon 6517P

Throughout this direct analysis, AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) emerges as the definite champion. The performance data indicate substantial advantages in most single-threaded scenarios. Whether you're putting together a gaming build, AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) offers superior capability in this segment. This CPU executes intensive computations with efficiency. This is notably apparent in actual usage.

Looking at a technical viewpoint, AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) offers better cache hierarchy, faster frequencies, and more optimized energy control. All these factors work together to provide consistently superior scores over multiple applications. The engineering improvements render AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) a compelling pick. Whether you're compiling, the processor manages it smoothly. Demanding users should notably appreciate these benefits.

Analyzing the specs, AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) surpasses 6517P from Intel across the majority of tests. For content creation, the performance difference leads to improved experiences. Those wanting maximum power will look at AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) as the better choice. The parallel capability is especially strong. Modern applications progressively take advantage of many processing units.

At the end of the day: AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) takes this battle decisively. Those seeking performance might strongly choose AMD EPYC 9175F (AMD) over 6517P from Intel. This benchmark results confirms this conclusion. The scenarios should profit from the better capabilities. This is a definite choice in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9175F
6517P
Core Specs
Cores
16
16 0.0%
Threads
32
32 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.2
3.2 -23.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.2 -16.0%
Frequency (GHz)
4.2
3.2 -23.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.2 -16.0%
Multiplier
42
32 -23.8%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
512 MB (shared)
72 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
320
190 -40.6%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
133,040 million
Die Size
16x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
3 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$4256
$1195
Part Number
100-000001145
SRVU4
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
103°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9175F Details View Xeon 6517P Details