CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 7303

CORE STATE Milan
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 130W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
AMD
AMD

EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 90W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,448
1,761
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
345
248
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
10,200
7,338
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,439
1,035
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
24,286
17,472
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,428
2,466
passmark_data_compression
428,319
232,242
passmark_data_encryption
25,167
15,809
passmark_extended_instructions
31,603
14,251
passmark_find_prime_numbers
180
109
passmark_floating_point_math
64,940
34,757
passmark_integer_math
113,422
62,128
passmark_multithread
28,572
20,556
passmark_physics
1,792
1,905
passmark_random_string_sorting
42,259
34,613
passmark_single_thread
1,460
2,371
passmark_singlethread
1,460
2,371

Analysis: AMD EPYC 7303 vs AMD EPYC 8024P

Analyzing the score figures for AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip and AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD), a clear picture emerges. AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip consistently delivers better scores throughout different scenarios. The benchmark superiority ranges from significant to exceptional based on the specific test. This dependability speaks to fundamental technical benefits. Buyers seeking performance might pay attention.

Playing games results similarly benefit AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip in this matchup. Increased performance and enhanced stable performance emerge from the stronger per-core capability. Gamers can notice enhanced experiences, notably in processor-intensive situations. The advantage continues in different resolutions. Competitive titles particularly profits from this speed advantage.

Analyzing the hardware, AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip surpasses AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD) over many performance metrics. For content creation, this benchmark gap means better results. Consumers seeking top-tier performance would consider AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip as the better selection. The concurrent throughput is particularly impressive. Modern workloads more and more utilize numerous threads.

At the end of the day: AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip claims this battle clearly. Buyers valuing capability would certainly consider AMD's AMD EPYC 7303 chip over AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD). The test numbers demonstrates this assessment. The workloads might benefit from its stronger power. It's a straightforward victor in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 7303
EPYC 8024P
Core Specs
Cores
16
8 -50.0%
Threads
32
16 -50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.4 0.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.4
3 -11.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.4 0.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.4
3 -11.8%
Multiplier
24
24 0.0%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB (shared)
32 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
130
90 -30.8%
Configurable TDP
120-150 W
70-100 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Zen 4c
Codename
Milan
Siena
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
8,300 million
8,875 million
Die Size
2x 81 mm²
73 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR5
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Six-channel
Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
230.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
AMD Socket SP6
PCIe
Gen 4, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
CCDs
2
Cores per CCD
8
IO Process Size
12 nm
6 nm
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$604
$409
Part Number
100-000001288100-100001288WOF
100-000001136
Package
FCLGA-4094
FC-LGA4844
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 7303 Details View EPYC 8024P Details